1:74. TLHAE PI-It wh-ru slierevn-aim-rl twp! or three years. It is stated that the first questio: she asked of those who came 1,0 redeem her was, whether Jonathan Strong was ma.rrs¢_-d, H(5 was married ~ '10!‘ I’ "11?" b-illliz c0n.~'i'icru-rl vcrx uncertain, Ar. ..er her return, she also married. But, in 1761, he-.1‘ lu..~nn..n ..=.d Mr. Strong’s wife both died; and these aged pt--1's-mu ie in his 80th year, and she in her 76th-—-renewv dtlieir -.itr..n~.n. inent, after a lapse of 58 y---.rs, and were m'.trri<'d in 17«.2_*‘ Sylvester Judd, Esq., of Northampmvi, says that a third of a century ago. people were living in Northampton who had seen the venerable couple ride through the streets of that town ; she -eated on a pillion behind her husband. _ WE learn from the Cape of Good Hope papers that a Dutch- man recently died at Cape Town. at the age of seventy-nine years, who left behind two hundred and Seventy-eight child,-en THE ANNEXATION OF SA I701’. The only matter of importance contained in the English pa- pers brought by the North American is the dispatch of Lord John Russell to M. 'l‘houvenel, and the reply of the latter. Lord John Russell considers the annexation of Savoy as the revelation of a general policy of aggrandlzement on the part of France. and commences by intimating that, after examining the claim which France makes to the cession of Savoy and Nice, and the principles by which it is justified, he finds the first weak ‘and the-second unjust. I-le rapidiy exposes the absurdity of the ‘pretensefthat the increased power of Sardinia. with a popula- tion at most of 12,000 000, can be a source of danger to France, as th_e.first‘military power of the Con inent, with a population of 36,l),uQ.'0b0 essentially warlike and occupying avast compact territory, hill of natural resources. The suggestion that Sardinia might become a member of a Confederation arrayed against France and that, by having both ides of the Alps, she might open the road to other Powers to in- vade France, is met by the remark, that ‘ there never c -n be a confedgracy organized against France unless it be for common -defense against aggressions on the part of France, and that therefore France has it at all times in her power to avert the for- mation of such a confederacy. There is no power in Europe that does not wish to maintain friendly relations with France and there is none that could hope to reap any advantage from a voluntary and unprovoked rupture with so powerful a State.” The chances that such a confederacy would find an instru nent in Sardinia are of course diminished. not increased, by the power which its Government has lately acquired in Italy, and circumstances under which it has been obtained. The argument, ithen, in favor of the annexation of -...~avoy founded on the as- sumed insecurity of the French territory bordering on that province falls to the ground. But the most important part of Lord John Russell’s dispatch is that in which he considers the assertion of M. Thouvenel, that the demand for the cession of Savoy to France ought not to give umbrage to any State, because it is founded on a just balence of‘ forces, and is especially pointed out by the nature of things which has placed the French system of defense at the foot of the western slopes of the Alps. To this Lord John Russell replies : . -‘ H er Msjesty’s Government must be allowed _to remark that a demand for cession to a neighbors territory made by a State so powerful as France, and whose former and not very remote policy of territoral aggrandizement brought countless calamities upon Europe, cannot fail to tie umbrage to every State in- terested in the balance of power and in the maintenance of the general peace. Nor can that umbrage be diminished by the grounds on which the claim is founded ; because if a great military Power like France is to demand the territory of a neighbor upon its own theory of what constitutes geographical- ly its proper system of defense,it is evident that no State could be secure from the aggressions of a more powerful neighbor ; that might and not right would henceforth be the rule to de- termine territorial possession, and that the integrity and inde- pendence of the smaller States of Europe would be placed in perpetual jeopardy.” The di.-patch thus concludes: "‘H«-r M-aj~sty’s Government, then would beg to submit that no case has been made out to justify this cession on the ground of necessary defence for France, and that this cession would most unjustly, aid in violation of treaty engagements, mate- rially weakeu a defensive arrangement which united Europe has provided as a security for the neutrality and integrity to Switzerland. -' Great Britain has no direct interest of her own in this mat- ter ; and it is from no uuf'riendly feeling toward France that her re-.rnons_trances on this suliject have proceeded her Majes- ty’s Government ind ed. are deeply impressed with the con- viction that any territorial advantage which France might gain by the proposed annexation would be far more than counter- balanced by the mistrust with which it would inspire the other States and Powers of Europe. “The calamities which overspread by turns almost every part of the C1-DI-IIIBDI. of tfurxvpe, during the closing years of the last and the early yo-a"S of the present century, are still fresh in the memory of mankind. Their renewal would, indeed, be a de- plorable misfortune. and it cannot be surprising that the ‘atten- tion of nations and tneir ru ers should be directed, with anxious solicitude, to events which have a bearing both on the interests of the present and on the destinies of the future,” In reply, M. Thouvenel transmits a short dispatch, in which he sa s: “ I cannot tut experience a very lively feeling of regret that Ihave not succeed» d. as I desired, in modifying an opinion which WH8 already known to me through the previous commu- nications of the English Ambassador ; but the prolongation of any discussion on this subject would have no practical result, and I prefer, rather ih-an provoke a fresh exchange of explana- tions «qvially painful to both countries, to confine myself to as- .'-erting that, Lord John Russell's di.=p-ateli has not the c aracler ofa protest. In a word, the Government of her Bi-ittanuic Ma- je.~ty declares that it does not sliare the opinion 0-‘ the Govern- ment of the Emperor; but this divergence does not constitute an opposition of’ a nature to affect the relations of the Cabinets of Paris and London. I am s.inc+-rely pleased at this.” "As for the neutrality of Switzerland. which Lord John Rus- sell considers to be mt-naced by the annexation of Savoy to the territory of the Empire, I will content myself with remarking to you that France attaches the greatest interest to preserving it from any injury. The Emperor’s Government, therefore, has not hesitated. in ordrr to prove the sincerity of its dl.-.lp0.~‘lliI n in this respect, to ins-~rt in the treaty which it has just concluded at Turin, a clause in these terms: “It is understood that his Majesty the King of Sardinia can- not transfer the!‘ neutralized portions of Savoy except on the conditions upon which he himself possesses them. and that it will appertain to his Majesty the Emperor of the French to come to an understanding on this subject, both with the Powers represented at the Congress of Vienna and with the Swiss Coiifederat.ion, and to give them the guarantees required by the stipulations referred to in this ar-icle.” “ It appears to me that all 8.p.i.-I‘eheIlSl0IlS should disappear in the face of this spontaneous engagement, and that hence- forth her Britanic Majesty's Government, certain of having the opportunity of discussing the guarantees which shall, in pursuance of an European agw eement-,‘ie judged to be best fitted to realize. in their relations with the permanent neutrality of Swit- zerland, the ohjrct of the stipulations relative to the contingent neutralization of a part of Savoy, has no reason to fear that this interest, the importance of which we have thus recognized, wii not be settled in a satisfactory manner.” ~ OOMMAINDANT MA OEGAN. James MacEgan was born in the County of Cork, 1788. ' Scr- geant, December, 184:3 ; Sergeant-Major in 1804; Sous-l.ieuten- ant, 16th December, 1808; Lieutenant, l8l2 ; Lieutenant Adju- tan-Major, 1813; Captain Adjutant-Maj r, 1814. MacEagan made the campaigns and sieges in Spain and Por- tugal. 1.808 S) 10. 11. and 12, and the siege of Antwerp, 1814. The !‘P;.'_'llnt:Iil. l)l'lll‘,I tll~l):u d--ll in Swpiembel‘, 18l5,MacEagan retired on halt',p;iy H) tho town til A-1-soc-‘, M11: mas t’mpl(_)yed some time after in the 2d Regiment .L-g;_:, then commsuidnd by the Duke de Crelon, and he made the campaign of 1824 in Spain vgfth his new Colonel, as Captain Adjutant-Major, to whom he l I‘ ndered great service, on account of his knowledge of the Spanish language, and of the country they had to march through. }9'acEagan obtained the si t112tti'.\n of Adjutant of the Place of St. Oiner, in order to be with his fami! y. However, after the revolution of 1830. he was appointed to the command of the im ,.o._t«,.nt, fort Dc l’l<}«~ln.-e. a great honor‘ then, as war was expv of. en l<‘.nuil_y. M.-ici<.)agan was naniv-d command:-r of the citadel -nil town of Montreuil-sar-mer, where he retired on his pension or let:-eat (half pay). He was decorated with the cross of Chevalier de la Legion d’honneur, 25th of April, 1821; and, latterly, with the medal of St. Helena: “Napoleon I. a see com- pagnous de Glorie, la derniere penree le 5 Mai, 1821.” MacEagan was quite fitted to serve in the French army; being so young when he came to France, he soon learned to speak and write the language like a native ; besides, he was generous and gay; qualities which French ofilcers know well how to appreci- ate. MacEagan’s maternal uncle brought him to Paris to finish his education, in 1802, at the peace of Amiens. On the breaking and grandchildren. \5:._ , out _of the war in 1803, this gentleman returned to Ireland, leaving his nephew with a friend at Paris. LETTER TO DR. ”c21iH11f1j FROM NEW ORLEANS. The following letter appears in the Irish News, addressed to Dr. Cahill. We f'ully agree with Mr. Hare :— Rnv. Sn-—I have attentively read your lecture at the Acade- my of Music, New York. In this short letter I will not have space to follow you in that lecture, or to refer to former leo- tures and letters of yours elsewhere, which I would wish to do if I could spare time. As I love truth, love Ireland. love my religion, love Irish nationality and independence, I trust you will be kind enough to bear with me. if it seems to you, in tell- ing what I think the truth, that it is not couched or clothed in words of high _pol1sh,.but rather in blunt, honest terms, and though I may differ with you as a politician, you will hear the words of one, who is sincere and honest. I assure you it grieves me to differ with so able a Scholar Philosopher and Divine as the Rev. Dr. Cahill. or in othei words, it grieves me that I can never find the Rev. Dr. come up to the true type of an Irish nationalist. Consequently you will not be surprised, that upon Irish national grounds, I object, or rather take exception, to the tone of the lecture at the Academy of Music. I claim this right as an Irishman, loving his country no matter how high or exalted the individual may be witli whom_I differ,-—of course you will understand that I have no objection to any lecturer speaking of St. Patrick, and our orators statesmen and soldiers ; but I object to any man parading be: fore the world's eye and gaze the too of't repeated humiliating state of Ireland’s sufferings, woes and wrongs, unless when it is done for the purpose of elevating the people’s mind t action - an idea of course that never enters Dr. Cahill’s head; that would not be loyalty to the Queen and crown of England. We owe a debt of gratitude to that Queen and government for hunting us across the Atlantic to America, and all over the world, according to the Dr.’s logic, to give them religion, for which, by-the-by, they don’t appear to be very thankful. Sir I deny that this exodus, this expatriation, as you call it, is a pa’rt of the logic of God; we all know He permits such things to oc- cur; biit l assert that the starvation of 2% millions of people and the forced exodus of thousands to these shores, was the; work of the Queen of England and her ministers, for which I would be very sorry to accuse God Almighty. He, in His 9,11. wise providence has blessed the land; but Eugland’s iron rule and man’s curse is upon it. I will not speak now, or follow you in that portion of your lectures, wherein you speak of the fideli- ty _of the Irish to the faith, and the benefits to religion from emigration; but I would remark that the picture has two sides' you look upon the bright side. and do not even glance at the; dark side; and you take the same position with respect to the prosperity of the Irish in America---you look at the prosperous few, and forget the persecuted, kicked, and cuffed, and despised thousands all over the Union, I could point out cases of perse- cution here as well as in Ireland. At this moment I have in my mind’s eye, the case ofa gentle- man of respectability, a married man, and the only support of an aged father and mother, who lost his employment, through no fault of his, but purely by prejudice. he was lri.-h and he was a Democrat, and that was quite sufficient. I think. sir, as you are writing partly for thednformation of the Irish at home you ought to give them both sides-what is for and against, I admit you are not long enough. in this country to be able to judge for yourself, or for that just COIICI»-pfion of mam,-9 and things which the mportance of the fsuhject demands. Persons in Dublin have written to me for instructions and information with respect to coming here, and knowing well what they had td go through and meet with in this country, Ihave always invari- ably given them both sides of the question. But. to come back to your lecture, I deny that our present position, is, may be, or ever can be the best for us as you seem to say. To say this to a people without a nation and a home on the map of the world, is, to say the least, rather provoking and to cap the climax, at the end of. your lectures, you praisd the Irish for preserving their, nationality-—-save us from our friends say I. How in the name of patience. Dr., could they preserve what they haven’t got? Were they not cheated out of it, and robbed of it in 1800? and does not England keep them out of it to this day‘? The word nationalist may be applied to the Patriot seeking to recover his nationality, but it is worse than mocking to applaud a people for preserving what they‘ which you may see, who I consider a nationalist, and who I do not. ‘ Again, Doctor. in writing home you will be kind enough to inform your countrymen that in a great number of places in this big Republic, there is such a thing as taxation without re- presentation, so far as the ‘Irish are concerned, and that the killing of an Irishman now and then amounts to nothing; and and that there is at intervals such a thing a..~7nnI‘)/aw. &c , &c., and a grod many other little &c’s, very gelling to the Irish, 9. good deal ofup-hill work sometimes caused by bigotry and pre- judice, and that they don’t all lie on beds of roses and soft pil- lows. Again, Dr., I find you and some of-the clergy of Ireland opposed to taking aid from Louis Napoleon, Wrong again-—I would take aid to recover my nationality from a nation of"l‘urks, Jews, or Atheists; besides you have no right to speak for the people without ascertaining their wishes and I am certain the majority of the people would gladly take aid from France to liberate themselves. Please excuse the liberty I have taken. I remain, rev. sir, very respectfully your obt. servt., . Msnrm HARE. THE ADAMS EXPRESS ROBBEEY. The Bridgeport (Conn ) Standard says of the recently report- ed robbery of Adams Express, on the New York and New Ha- ven Railroad. It is now stated that the abstracted safe of the Adams Ex- ‘press Co. contained from $11000 to $16,000 —principallly in bills. One package contained ten $400 in bills ofthe Atlantic Bank of Boston-—-another $3,000 in bills of the Langdon Bank of Dover, New Hampshire. There were smaller amounts of other bank bills with a number of notes—some belonging to Rathbone, Bros. It was not such a very big haul as was at first supposed and it will be rather difficult to make the funds im- mediately available. Nothing is yet known as to the place or manner of abstrac- tion. Some suppose that the thing did not reach New Haven at all, but the general impression is, that it was taken of be- tween New Haven and Norwalk One of the Railroad em- ployees who got on the train at the latter place, thinks it was not then in its usual place. The safe weighs but some 200 lbs. only. It could have been thrown out while the curs were in motion. The Express room is in the forward part; of the bagg- age car, adjoining the Post Oflice or Mail Room the rear part of the car being used for the transportation of baggage. Of course, the Messenger was not at his post as his duty re- qulred, and of course persons not connected with too road or 1*. 0. were allowed to come into and remain in the car. It is suppo«ed that persons may have been passing up and down on the road for Works, watching an opportunity for plunder. As it is supposed that the safe was thrown out, on the way, the vicinity of the track between New York and New Haven has been examined. Other investigations are in progress. The Express Co. have paid all amounts shown to be infest- ihg, and active exertions will be made to detect the plunderers. It is supposed that the safe has been buried or pr-rho ps sunk in the river. » It is Said that another safe cov~inin'.ng a larger amount of money, being near by, was overlooked or not ab- stracted. Am a recent dinner of the General Theatrical ‘Fund. in Lon- don, Mr. Blackstone, the Treasurer, stated that the cipltal now amounted to £12000; that during the last year eleven annuities of’ from £60 to £90 had been granted, and that £250 had been voted toward the building of the Dramatic College. . THREE hunters from Kansas, says the St. Louis Bulletzfn, late- ly returned from a month s hunt on the Arkansas River bring- ing with them the skins_-of three hundred and seven wolves, Another party of twelve, in two months’ time, secured over two thousand skins. The skins are worth one dollar apiece. IT is stated that 20 000 Swedes and Norwegians are preparing to embark early in the coming Summer for the Umt,d States. have not. In the Cltizen of 17th October, 757. appears a letter. of mine headed “Rev. Dr. Cahill and Irish Nationality,” from