. ‘V  , :;.'.:' .ju-:41_-..:-‘-~« 1 .. . . . . .  - ...  .  .- -.  -; . . ....-.~ .;.;'r*$'r..:a'
s- ‘ 1. - .-_:“_ A . I.  4 ‘ J, . 7 . - .1”. “ - . ' ti.‘ ‘Li. Z. .l_, I '. "LV. .  A 1. z _ ‘ __ e , . c :  i
1 ‘A   ’ ' :  A J.    " ’ .-‘: 5 J \ A. ' H J‘
 H ' ‘ C “ ' A ' -1
‘ . ‘ - ‘ - . 0  _ V _j '
S : x  ... ..   -THE- 0 ...l. . MISSO.@IAI°l'£ATURDAYé.NOVEMBER 1  ,,  . , _ _ . MA‘. Pun!-xvi
,' _ ,. '. . . ‘ . . . . .. I I ‘ .: V . > V ‘f TT_. ‘ W ‘.1. . ‘ V ____é—__
 .1. "inf .  ’ . . ‘ x‘ . x of
- 3'-,;"’ C .1.‘..:...'.r..‘t‘,fy -  _:- . - if
f :9‘; ~‘*~-V at-oh» . . . 1/ ’ 
'4. 2
, :- ' S 
; 2.
5' . , “J
2-: . -'
‘ . . ‘ " ‘iv
-. '.
made ‘Y. 3   F‘
qnauldingg ' ‘
0’ _ ‘ a .
A50 *1 3
13805 A '

meats’:  .

v‘-31

   

i_‘f
ts

    

vsh Cir _ ‘
.-\GI-I '
your he

he you r.

-
.__,____‘ pi-9- :4: Tf 
.._.—_....-<. —._.-......_-.¢..-.4 —- ‘ ' ‘
-‘Tl-4 ‘*3a'-':"o":"-?"J’.o""“Z_'.--‘..‘.;‘..

.. ,..-- ,-..- . _~ ‘ -

A .' .- '

' *‘‘\u.
I

‘ 0
4- .‘-'

   

-___..__. ..—........_;:'.{...
."\4l
‘ t.‘u‘._._..,-,_.-.... .-_,
-4.-rwo --~ ~ 
, .' ~. .. ' \. '
...

  

;-.«
V-4.

   
 

- political, but that they are fiscal.

Why 100 Columbia Men Favor    
A R Adoption of ,

We areconcerned only with the best interests of
Columbia.

We ibelieve that the most representative, the most
democratic city administration will be obtained when
all of the people participate in the selection of our of-

.ficials.

We do not believe that the affairs of Columbia are
Our city problems
are business problems, not political problems. The
present 'Mayor-Council form of government is not fit-
ted to .,conditions. We want" the affairs of the city
administered just as those of the University, the public
schools, the banks and other business affairs are ad-
ministered. A I

p Welwant to forever prevent the possibility of dead-
-locks between Mayor and Council and the consequent

loss in efficiency for which thepeople pay.   

Wehave no criticism to off_er of the present Mayor
and Council personally, but they are hampered by a
system of government unadapted to the situation..

We do not favor concentrated authority so much
as concentrated responsibility. We believe that more
efficiency, more harmony and more economy will be

_ secured when the Police Department, the Water and

Light Department, the Health "Department the Street

City Manager Government

Department are brought under the authority of one
body responsible to the people. Such an organization’
will be efficient! It will be democratic! It will be
representative!

We believe that the City Manager plan will an
complish all of these ends. Because, such a plan has
proven successful in scores of cities throughout the
country. It has proven successful in banks, factories,

mercantile establishments and particularly in our pub- -
tlic schools and University. The plan appeals to our

business judgment It will result in the careful study
of the problems of equitable tax assessment and tax
collection; the problem of health protection and sanita-
tion; the problem of law enforcement and police protec-
tion; the problem of the economical purchasing of sup-
plies and the employing of labor, and the problem of
the duplication of effort and the consequent expense
to tax payers. '

Why? Because, under the City Manager Plan it
is the duty of the Council to see that officers are
selected for that purpose and the Council’s authority
is such that it can enforce careful and intelligent at-
tention to all such matters.

We call upon the citizens of Columbia, laying
aside all prejudice, personal and political, to give

‘earnest and unbiased study to this vital question.

coups-nee -1-. .20-~

 

  

V

5. * 1 W. B. Nowell, Jr. A. H. Hunten John E. Sykes D. Klass

I ‘  U. S. Hall G. D. Crist S. L. Slaughter E. D. Baskett. ’

”‘ _  E. c. Clin les .1. M. Short 0. F. W. S. Whittle T‘

' f W. IL Br ton R. E. Lucas R. H. Jacobs 101“! M- Alexfilldeli
1, John F. Tehan E. Sydney Stephens . F. A. Irwin George C» Helm ‘ _
Hg 4 ~ N. T. Gentry . . Lucas - G. P. Simpson Gm. B.~Orton— :: - -- -- -- --- --
. A J. J. Oppenheimer John S. Ankeney J. F. Ch ° James Moscow ‘- 1
‘Q. J- A D0ll8‘l88 L. M. Defoe Jofe Hendrick R. H. Hill .
  J. A. Adams L. T. Ralston A. L. Jones Robert 1. Srmpson
, L J. B. Cole B D Simon J. W. Candle G- H8111’? P

“*“ F. W. Smith J R. Richards T. ton N 13- Wade _

'3 J. G Long F A Dalton H. L. Jennings H8173’ 3- 1131181118

M: A. J Estes H. O. Severance P. . Reed . ‘ ' G€0l'8‘9 1- Goldman

. . J W Bernard E. J. McCaustland ' J E. Armstrong ' 101111 L- Flatt

*1 ‘ T 3 i - J. W. Simonton T. J. Rodhouse N. H. Walden N- H- Co_Wden

To ~ Thomas S. Barclay L. W. Berry E. D. Barton C W. DISZGS

m- Jack Taylor ' G D. Edwards D. A. Grun John Qllarles

 H. M. Craig x Edgar D. Lee S. Ray C» 13- Gare)’

n~- T. R. Taylor A. A. Millard V. G. Hawkins _ . L» 07- S8l1f0!'d

,, E. F. Thomas ‘ J E. Thornton H. I. -7811108 G-0!'d0n

Zr °. Do Mllfbhy C L. Brewer Edw. Simon Paul H1119“?

is A -A , _ Pearl Smith J. G. Armstead r’\-- W. N. Simon W. R088!‘ Hfllett

11- ‘ § A Charles Jacobs A. L. Ferguson C L. Eatherton J» 3- Heberlmx

' , ; A Chas. ;H. Burr I-I. Walter C J. P. cBaine - Byron James
. x s 4 l , c. o. Heibel E. Pa Shields 11 H. Switzer H. G Baker

d._ ’ T 3 ' A‘

.35 1 -

*5.‘ -— ‘} “
§:  > _ J
(I! ' "1: f 1 ’ - V

1, 1 : ' I

0. V :  .; _ 5 ‘ g A i 
‘,3,  A  . V 3.1‘ I ., c 
n‘ in  M ‘ ‘ V 4 .

lid ’ C «  ' f 1 “ ‘.~

 

 

93
.
" .a- -
 ——.¢.g% .- .......--.._-.-.
. ‘ »