(165,641 - 165,660 of 182,071)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage09
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
arguments have been made in another case challenging the ”must carry" rules which also is pending before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Quincy Cable TV, Inc. v. F.C.C. Quincy concerns denial C 3/ Report and Order in Docket Nos. 20988 and 21284, 79 F.C.C.2d 4 663 (T880), aff'd, Malrite TV of New York v. F.C.C., 652 F.2d ll40 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. ll43 (1982). 4/ Petition
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage19
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
and offered a reasonable opportunity .2}! n f to respond. c 35/ The "fairness doctrine" is under present review by the F.C.C. ggl 47 C.F.R. § 76.209(b),(c) (1983) (cable); 47 C.F.R. § 73.1920 (1983) (broadcast). s 23/ 47 C.F.R. § 76.209(d) (1983) (cable); 47,C.F.R, § 73. 1930 i(l9833—(broadcast).d gfij Inquiry Into the General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of. Broadcast Licensees, Notice of Inquiry
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage11
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
"signals to its subscribers. CRS-6 Copyright Protection Applicable to Cable Retransmissions of Broadcast§igg§1s In 1968 the Supreme Court ruled that cable retransmission of V broadcast signals did not constitute infringement of the property rights protected by the Copyright Act of 1909. Its decision was based upon the differences in technology and function between cable and broadcast
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage05
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
A BRIEF OVERVIEWOF CABLETELEVISION LAW Introduction Since their inception in the late 1940's and early 1950's, cable systems have increased significantly in number, size, and function. Debate on the details of an appropriate regulatory scheme for cable has continued for a number of years, but despite several significant attempts, Congress has not enacted a comprehensive federal cable
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
201 (1983), appeal docketed sub nom. Qunicy Cable TV, Inc. v. F.C.C., D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals No. 83-1283 (filed May 31, 1983), argued January 17. 1984, remanded to F.C.C., S5 R.R.2d 1099 (D.C. Cir. 1984). A
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage03
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
Execntive Summary This report briefly discusses the Federal law applicable to cable f ‘television systems in the following five specific substantive areas 1 and provides references for further study. 1. Mandatory cable carriage of local broadcast signals. 2. Copyright protection applicable to cable retransmissions of broadcast signals. . 3. Cable carriage of "pornographic" programs. 4
-
-
Title
-
CRS86564Epage03
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:38330
-
Text
-
.upswing and what aspects are unusual? ABSTRACT ‘ J % » This paper examines the current: economic expan experience. [What aspects of the current expansion are typical of an eeonomic 6 , I I I v I I sion in light of previous .1:
-
-
Title
-
CRS86564Epage13
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:38330
-
Text
-
',CRSf5. = demand and’ accelerated growth in the money stock. “At the end of 19854 both, T , short- and long-p-term nominal interest rates ‘were; .below_their‘levels at the recession troughin November 1982. Thedecline in interest rates this year has likely been a‘ factor in the dollar‘ exchange‘ rate ‘decline ‘in 1985. Based on the Federal Reserve, index (1973-5100) the trade weighted
-
-
Title
-
CRS86564Epage07
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:38330
-
Text
-
of the current expansion real investment is up at an annual rate of 18.5 percent, compared to an historical average of 11.6 percent. The increase has not been spread evenly across all types of investment spending. Much of the growth in investment has been in producers’ durable equipment, especially automobiles and office machinery (computers).
-
-
Title
-
CRS87219Apage12
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:39689
-
Text
-
, criminal penalties, damages to successful litigants suffering from mortgage transaction of double fees they paid to the lender. 1986 N.Y. Laws., ch. 550, requires mortgage bankers to provide applicants with a written explanation of reasons for denial of a mortgage loan yapplication. Qhio Revised Code sec. 1349.11 requires disclosure of relationships between mortgage brokers and affiliated lending
-
-
Title
-
CRS87219Apage08
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:39689
-
Text
-
CRS-4 ‘to "gather and compile information concerning, and to investigate from time to time the organization, business, conduct, practices, and management of" businesses engaged in commerce and their relation to other businesses. l5 U.S.C. 46. Banks and savings and loan institutions are exempted from the coverage of this legislation, 15 U.S.C. 46; mortgage bankers are not. -It
-
-
Title
-
CRS87219Apage07
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:39689
-
Text
-
is subject to the requirements of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-533, 88 Stat. l724, l2 U.S.C. 2601, et seq., and the regulations thereunder promulgated by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Affairs. 24 C.F.R. Part 3500 (Regulation X).‘ Since mortgage banking firms generally sell their loans on the secondary market and, in l980, sold 75% of their residential mortgages
-
-
Title
-
CRS87219Apage01
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:39689
-
Text
-
L{-l X,/ 3 r 1; # 87 .1229 A I‘ _ _ x % ,,/fix Congressnonal Research Service 3 The Library of Congress 5 87-219 A VWmhmgmn,D£L 205“) Govemment‘ Pubfrcations Unfi i AUG 1 6 1994 Washington {Jn.vers:ty“ Libraries St. LOUIS, Mo. 53130 REGULATION OF MORTGAGE BROKER INDUSTRY M. Maureen Murphy Legislative Attorneye American Law Division February 18, 1987
Pages