Search results

(165,681 - 165,700 of 182,803)

Pages

CRS87125ENRpage23
Title
CRS87125ENRpage23
Page from
info:fedora/mu:45987
Text
CRS-15 works with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the State fish and wildlife agencies in application of procedures for habitat inventory and evaluation as required by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934. Egriodic or annual reports: The SCS does not ordinarily publish periodic reports regarding assistance to aquatic-related resources.i However, the SCS has published bulletins
CRS86538SPRpage05
Title
CRS86538SPRpage05
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
CRS-2 of the original administration's reductions restored by Congress at approximately their FY85 levels. _l/ Under the GRH law the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) are to issue a joint report which calculates the budgetary resources and outlays that must be reduced to meet the law's deficit targets. For FY86, an $11.7 billion reduction
CRS86538SPRpage29
Title
CRS86538SPRpage29
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
CRS-26 Funding for Fossil Eiergy (S millions) FY85 Appropriation A FY86 Baseline_ GRH cm 348 325.971 311.954 Selected Major Program Elements FY853 FY86 APPR. Baseline GRH Coal 5 252.627 254.189 4 243.259 Petroleum 31.961 ‘30.303 29.000 Unconventional Gas Recovery 10.227 8.850 8.469 Fossil Energy Construction 4.916 3.469 3.32 EXPECTED IMPACT or GRAMM-RUDMAN-HOLLINCS ‘ Based in part on various
CRS86538SPRpage06
Title
CRS86538SPRpage06
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
CRS-3 Resolution for Fiscal Year i986 which specifically defined a PPA for different agencies. '_i/ For_most of the agencies in this report, amendment 10 specifies that the 4.3 percent reduction should be applied to "each program, project activity and subactivity contained in the budget justification documents submitted to the House and Senate in support of the fiscal year 1986 budgets
CRS86538SPRpage50
Title
CRS86538SPRpage50
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
CRS-47 have to be reduced. Several of the program directors pointed out that with further cuts possible in their FY87 budgets, it would be inappropriate to fund smaller grants that could be cancelled due to the unavailability of research funds. At this time, most of the program directors were not able to indicate specifically how fewer grants or;a 4.3 percent cut across-the-board would affect their programs. However, future growth in such activities as the engineering research centers would be slowed down. Further, large capital projects such as the very long baseline array, Cornell's electron storage ring, and Wisconsinls synchrotron center would probably suffer delays. One particular area that could be the target of reprogramming requests‘ is instrumentation. Some of the program directors indicated that in order to save some grants, they may have to reduce their level of support for instrumentation. They recognize the need for updating their laboratories, but indicated that people and their research come first. The Program, Management and Development (PDM) account could suffer the most under GRH because of its first year 92-95 percent outlay rate. NSF's research programs average a first year outlay rate of 55 percent. Conse- quently, NSF may restore funds to the PDM account through reprogramming, (which would require committee review) or the cancellation of procurement actions such as the purchase of a new main frame computer. Overall the program directors believe they can "live" with the FY86 GRH reductions. Their major concern is the potential severity of future cuts under GRH and the serious impacts such cuts would have on their programs-
CRS86538SPRpage19
Title
CRS86538SPRpage19
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
According to DOE, for most conservation program areas, the primary impact of the FY 1986 Gramm-Rudman-Hollings cuts will be a slowdown in the scheduled completion of ongoing projects and programs. No program terminations or other significant impacts are **“~‘:eJ F>r the Industrial, Transportation and Multi- Sector areas. However, because the Buildings area consists of many small programs, some of them
CRS86538SPRpage18
Title
CRS86538SPRpage18
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
report on energy and water development appropriations (H. Rept, 99-307); and the revised FY 1986 budget after the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings (GRH) cuts are applied. Program »FY85 FY86 GRH Nuclear sciences 43.6 47.392 46.111 Materials sciences. l92.l 196.941 189.457 Chemical sciences 94.4 96.165 92.511 Applied Math. sciences 36.6 45.590 43-858 Engineering & geosciences 28.2 36.175 34.800, Advanced energy
CRS86538SPRpage36
Title
CRS86538SPRpage36
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
) 51.9 55.0 52.7 1Research and Development (Pollution, Control and Abatement) 141.1 168.4 161.2 CC111i11—Q::c¢1::—u¢<¢-9111:;-o-— —caccuc-at:::111c1:11:-$u&;:co-—<—<o:icn:-otpoxj Total R&D Acct. I«3.- 223.4 213.9
CRS86538SPRpage47
Title
CRS86538SPRpage47
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
and Program Management 1,336 Total NASA Affected by GRH: Funding Exempt from GRH: Total NASA: 7,511 FY86 2,757 205 439 1,547 354 168 16 11 17 3,243* 139 1,362 7,506 150* 7,656 GRH 2,638 196 420 1,480 339 161 15 10.5 16 3,108* 133 11,303 7,182 150* 7,232 *Approximately $150 million Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) is exempt
CRS86538SPRpage35
Title
CRS86538SPRpage35
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56506
Text
CRS-32 FAA RESEARCH, ENGINEERING AXD DEVELOPMENT--TRUST FUND This program funds FAA efforts to automate the air traffic control function, including the host computer and the advanced automation system. The DOT budget office had no substantive information about the effects of the sequestration. CATEGORY FY85 FY86 GRH RE&D-Trust Fund 265.0 190.0 181.3
CRS8786Lpage78
Title
CRS8786Lpage78
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
CRS8786Lpage51
Title
CRS8786Lpage51
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
Text
Chicago (Tribune November 14,s1986; p. 10. '31 986 Reproduced with Permission. Chicago Tribune Mr. Reagan gets in hot Water President Reagan has brought a storm of denunciation on himself by vetoing an $18 billion ex- tension of the Clean Water Act. Especially in the Chi- cago area, where the veto will have an immediate im- pact on funding for the Deep Tunnel project, environmentalists seem
CRS8786Lpage93
Title
CRS8786Lpage93
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
Text
Elie illas l)i11gi.011 1,1051 January 26, 1987; p. A1Ci ° 1 98 7 Reproduced with Permission, The Washington Post Wzter Polo back to the president by "veto-proof margins the clean water bill he pocket-vetoed after Congress adjourned (and the congressional elec- tions were over) last year. More will be made of this first act of the new Democratic Congress than it deserves. Bills that can pass
CRS8786Lpage17
Title
CRS8786Lpage17
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
CRS8786Lpage13
Title
CRS8786Lpage13
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
Text
~ ‘ ORE. $27.4 lDAHO ,~~ $1;i\{" /' NEV. \. 31‘-9 UTAH ’ “ / $12.8_._ CALlF\.\\ ,1; 330-9 $11.9 $173.5 H ' ' W w.vA. VA.x$9.9.'2 . \ -3349.7 \ DEL +-—-————---7 The Clean Water Act was passed by the 100th Congress and then vetoed by;« President Reagan. Both houses of Congress voted to override his veto so the legislation becomes law. sThe chart gives an idea of how
CRS8786Lpage52
Title
CRS8786Lpage52
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
CRS8786Lpage04
Title
CRS8786Lpage04
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
CRS8786Lpage80
Title
CRS8786Lpage80
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
Text
._..I\¢‘.l]‘ll:|‘l, 14} ‘J1
CRS8786Lpage07
Title
CRS8786Lpage07
Page from
info:fedora/mu:75817
Text
‘ 1.. ‘\\l. VII ‘ “ L\vtl|.|l«ll|II»l..1/ 11. y
CRS84627EPWpage10
Title
CRS84627EPWpage10
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80533
Text
Committee, Subcommittee on Education, Arts and Humanities, in hear~ ings on Oversight of Quality in Education: Report of the National Commission on Excellence in Education, July 21, 1983, p. 2. 5/ Daniel B. Taylor, Senior Vice President, New York Office of the .College Board, in testimony before the House Subcommittee on Elementary Secondary, and Vocational Education, January 31, 1984.

Pages