(166,001 - 166,020 of 183,387)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS861048Apage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:72322
-
Text
-
a sexually oriented conversation between lovers, in violation of each party's right of privacy. 9 41 721 F.2d 1281 (10th Cir. 19s3). 5?
-
-
Title
-
CRS861048Apage18
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:72322
-
Text
-
it unlawful to knowingly display any of these materials "in a manner whereby juveniles may examine and peruse" them, and was held by the court to be unconstitutionally overboard-' Under the standard established in a 1975 Supreme Court decision, Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville,44 a statute is not facially overboard unless (1) it cannot easily be given a narrowing construction, and (2) it has
-
-
Title
-
CRS86564Epage11
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:38330
-
Text
-
CRS-4 TABLE 1- Relative Contributions to Growth Over the=First',l1 Quarters ' ‘ of Economic Expansion (measured in real terms) ' = ' Current Expansion‘: ’Average Expansion Total‘GNP ‘.‘_ ‘ ‘ 1 ‘. 100.0 Z ,1~ , * 100.0 % Personal»Consumption Expenditures ‘ » 66.7 i 50.8 Gross Private Domestic Investment 50.3 1 A y-‘ 29.5 Government Purchases of Goods and‘Services 12.8 ,2 2 * y
-
-
Title
-
CRS861048Apage19
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:72322
-
Text
-
in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(b)(2) stated that it was a defense to prosecution under § 223(b) that the defendant had taken either of the following steps to restrict access to the prohibited conversations: (a) operating only between the hours of 9:00 p.m- and 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time, or (b) requiring payment by credit card before 45 802 F.2d at 695 n. 8, 696. 45 £1. at 696.
-
-
Title
-
CRS861048Apage15
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:72322
-
Text
-
that there are other requirements which must be met before these laws will be upheld. For example, there is an additional requirement, now set forth as the second element of the Miller standard, that the proscribed material be "specifically I 35 £3: at 636, citing Bookcase, Inc. v. Broderick, 18 N.Y.2d 71, 75, 218. N.E.2d 668, 671 (1966), appeal dismissed for want o£_a_properly presented federal question sub
-
-
Title
-
CRS861048Apage13
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:72322
-
Text
-
to such matter can be restricted, the question becomes to what extent, if at all, adult accessa. can also be limited if this is necessary to protect minors in this fashion- 23 423 u.s. 49 (1973). 24 "Telephone Pornography," su ra n. 15/ at 518. 25 United States v. Reidel, 402 U.S. 351 (1971). 25 United States v.Thirty-Seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363 (1971). 27 The 1983 amendment's legislative
-
-
Title
-
CRS87317Apage03
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:32127
-
Text
-
ABSTRACT About half the states have recently modified or eliminated their laws on joint and several liability. In these states, if two or more defendants con- ; . tribute to a tort, then, at least in some circumstances, each is liable onlyp in proportion to his share of responsibility, instead of 100 percent liable.
-
-
Title
-
CRS87317Apage07
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:32127
-
Text
-
CRS-3 Illinois. 1986 Laws, Public Act 84-1431, amended Ill. Stat. Ann., Ch. 110, § 2-1117, to retain joint and several liability for medical expenses, but, with respect to all other damages, to eliminate it for defendants who are less than 25% responsible. Notwithstanding this provision, § 2-1118 retains joint and several liability in pollution cases except with respect to any defendant who
-
-
Title
-
CRS87317Apage09
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:32127
-
Text
-
their responsibility is 50% or greater. New Mexico. The New Mexico Court of Appeals, in Bartlett v. New Mexico’ Welding Supply, Inc., 98 N.M. 152, 646 P.2d 579 (1982), abolished joint and several liability in comparative negligence cases. New York. 1986 Laws, Ch. 682 (adding Civil Practice Law and Rules, Art. 16). _.______. / eliminated joint and several liability for noneconomic damages but not with respect
-
-
Title
-
CRS87317Apage05
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:32127
-
Text
-
§§ 1431 et sag. to eliminate; I joint and several liability for noneconomic damages. (Noneconomic damages iii include, among other things, pain and suffering and punitive damages; economic _ damages include, among other things, medical expenses and lost earnings.)jih Colorado. 1986 Laws, Ch. 108, created Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-111.5 to eliminate joint and several liability.
-
-
Title
-
CRS87317Apage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:32127
-
Text
-
CRS-6 Texas. Section 1 of Acts 1985, 69th Leg., Ch. 959, repealed Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. Art. 2212a, which provided for joint and several liability except where the defendant's negligence was less than the plaintiff's. Utah. 1986 Laws, Senate Bill No. 64, amended Utah Code Ann. § 78-27-40 to eliminate joint and several liability. Vermont. Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12, § 1036, abolished
-
-
Title
-
CRS872Epage03
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:45613
-
Text
-
of both funds, in light of continuing financial volatility affecting them. FINANCING CAPABILITES The fundamental aspects of the status of the deposit insurance funds ap- pear in charts 1 and 2 (p. 2 and 3). They show that the FDIC and FSLIC have continuing authority to borrowfrom the U.S. Treasury in the form of direct Government loans (12 U.S.C. 1824, 12 U.S.C. l725(i)). when legislated in 1950
-
-
Title
-
CRS872Epage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:45613
-
Text
-
. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1986. Part 1, 827 p.; Part 2, 1628 p.;. Part 3, 823 p.; U.S. Congress. Senate- Conmittee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Comprehensive Reform in the Financial Services Industry. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1985. Part I, 992 p.; Part II, 1341 p.; Part III, 38 p.; and, Deposit Insurance Reform and Related Supervisory Issues. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off
-
-
Title
-
CRS872Epage05
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:45613
-
Text
-
CRS--3 ~i mxz<m Z<O._ m:2OI ..<Eom.¢ 29: aommom z<o...... mzo_SE.mz_ Bmamz. Z0 >35 zo_.:_m m.%....... Eamfimp .m.: zo >35 zo_.:_2 omgzz . zo:.__m_ 92 .5 >:DOm_ .:/m2zE>oo....... >.E<m> m:monmo .._o Fzmommn. owe mm_mmm_mm<...... mzo_S.Emz_ moz_><m ¢mm.m. mmE:mz_....... om<om xz<m Z<O;_ m:2OI 4<ES.._ >m_ aE.omm5........ 1%? dm mmmzmgmmmx zo
Pages