(166,021 - 166,040 of 183,376)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS86760GOVpage06
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:73336
-
Text
-
332 75 DELANARE 01 554,335 755 140 0.1325 152 7 DIST, OF COL. 01 535.333 1.255 101 0.1555 115 77 FLORIDA 01 512.572 2.571 51 0.5013 51 753 FLORIDA 02 513,075 144 355 0.0251 357. 75 FLORIDA 03 512.542 3.774 44 0.7352 45 50 FLORIDA 04 512,557 1. 5* 107 0.2125 105 51 FLORIDA 05 513.010 507 157 0.1153 155 52 FLORIDA 05 513.113 207 335 0.0403 335 53 FLORIDA 07 513.112 521 157 0.1015 150 54 FLORIDA 05 512
-
-
Title
-
CRS86760GOVpage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:73336
-
Text
-
~.1 u) m —» L. (nrLmUHnI» 0)m(DUIb(N .2048 .1607 .1830 .3345 .8653 .3262. .6756 .2148 .1792 .1433 .3247 .5022 .6595 .1416 .3108 .0868 .1945 .2097 .0853 .3707 .0843 .0305 .0479 .0486 .0515 .0449 .0250 .0313 .0446 .0112 .0188 .0291 .0834 .0352 .1230 .0380 .0258 .0111 .1406 .0202 .0321 .0064 .0192 .0760 .0756 .0422 .0833 .0235 .0461 .0641 N-—»N - \j ...b C) ——-3 I) -‘N I5 I'\.) \J (D ‘J \J [2 (U C
-
-
Title
-
CRS86760GOVpage30
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:73336
-
Text
-
.718 0.0325 NORTH CAROLINA 08 538.303 0.0321 OHIO 14 514,882 0.0318 OKLAHOMA 02 505.070 0.0318 NEERASK 01 523.024 0.0315 MISCONSIL .08 523.188 0.0313 NEN YORK 30 518.838 0.0313 PEN?-.;3\’L1.1'A?1ZA 11 5’5.874 0.0310 TENNESSEE 08 511.805 0.0308 TEXAS 04 527,172 0.0307 HEN YORK 24 515.580 0.0305 OHIO . 17 515.223 0.0305 OKLAHOMA 03 504.288 0.0301 PENNSYLVANIA 17 515.808 0.0288 KENTUCKY 01 525.844 0.0285
-
-
Title
-
CRS86760GOVpage25
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:73336
-
Text
-
TEXAS 05 525.533 0.1525 MARYLAND 01 525.123 0.1525 TEXAS 03 525.433 0.1503 3ENHSYLVANIA 07 515.737 0.1450 TEXAS 15 527.401 0.1435 NEW YORK 12 515.300 0.1433 NEW YORK 16 516.170 0.1416 NORTH CAROLINA 07 533.055 0.1405 HEW 051351 04 525.100 0.1352 OKLAHOMA 04 505.554 0.137 FLORIDA 15 512.555 0.1375 NEN JERSEY 02 525.111 0.1353 PENNSYLVANIA 03 515.113 0.1331 Nsw YORK 02 515 403 0.1323 DELAWARE. 1 534
-
-
Title
-
CRS86760GOVpage20
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:73336
-
Text
-
343 SOUTH CAROLINA 08 513.248 200 344 GEORGIA 08 541.723 1 133 345 WEST VIRGINIAA 02 437.433 135 345 WYOMING 01 433.557 V 134 347 GEORGIA 08 543.001 134 343 WISCONSIN 07 522.507 133 343 TEXAS 21 528.322 133 350 OHIO 18 513.215 131 351 NORTH CAROLINA I 02 538,177 183 352 MONTANA I 01 333.238 188 353 LOUISIANA 07 525.437 135 354 ALABAMA 05 543.344 135 355 TEXAS 02 528.832 184 355 NEW HAMPSHIRE 02 453
-
-
Title
-
CRS86760GOVpage26
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:73336
-
Text
-
.755 0.1215 153 ILLINOIS 01 515.545 0.1201 154 NISSOURI 0 545.137 0.1157 155 FLORIDA 05 513.010 0.1153 155 LOUISIANA 01 525.452 0.1172 157 RROOE ISCAN0 01 474.515 0.1153 155 ARIZONA 01 543.535 0.1155 155 MICHIGAN 12 514.524 0.1135 170 MINNESOTA 05 505.504 0.1135 171 MICHIGAN 02 514 355 0.1132 172 MINNE°OTA 05 505.353 0.1127 173 TEXAS 17 525.525 0.1125 174 TEXAS 11 527.323 0.1121 175 INOIANA 01 547.127
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage08
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
were upheld in Black Hills Video Corp. v. F.C.C., 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968). 2/ The "consensus agreement" is set out at 36 F.C.C.2d 284-287 (1972).
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage13
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
upheld the C.R.T.'s ,controversial decision to charge substantially higher rates for 9/ carriage of the newly-authorized signals. 9/ National Cable Television Assoc., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Tr1buEa1, 724 F.2d 176 (D.C.Cir. 1983). s
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage01
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
3+/We LCILMX/5; Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress Washingtoh, D.c. 20540 LTK {"45}-M|"] Rpt 34»%55 Pr as WW‘ 4 E» I I .. A 3%‘! Weehimtem Ezifiniversity -A BRIEF OVERVIEW or CABLE TELEVISION LAW David R. Siddall Legislative Attorney American Law Division I September 13, 1984
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage16
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
brought in from out of state and transmitted on local cable systems. Thus the State of Oklahoma law interpreted as requiring deletion of liquor advertisements on those signals being brought in from out of state was held to be invalid. lél United States v. Southwestern Cable, 392 U.S. 157 (1968); United States v. Midwest Video COtE:, 406 U.S. 649 (1972) (M1dWe8t Video I); and F.C.C. v. Midwest Video Corp
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage07
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
‘ CRS-2 Today cable systems commonly use satellite transponders and satellite receivingstations for receiving a variety of program imaterial. Several of the satellite signals used by cable systems carry broadcast signals (such as WOR, Secaucus, New Jersey; WGN, Chicago, Illinois; and WTBS, Atlanta, Georgia). Many additional satellite signals carry program networks which are exclusively
-
-
Title
-
CRS84853Apage20
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77210
-
Text
-
CRS-15 The F.C.C. has also proposed amendment or repeal of both the "personal V s 25/ attack" and the "political editorial" rules. Dav d R. Siddall ‘ Legislative Attorney American Law Division September 13, 1984 ‘g§/ Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concernin5_the Fairness iDoctrine and Political CablecastingiRequirements for Cable Television Szstems, Proposed Rule, 48
-
-
Title
-
CRS861048Apage21
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:72322
-
Text
-
[Carlin II], 787 F.2d 846 (2d Cir. 1986). I 52 Id. at 848. (This objection does not apply to a live conversation, where the party called can obtain the access code, credit card number, or other required information.) 53 Apparently two-way access is available in most other parts of the country. 54 Id.
-
-
Title
-
CRS85719Apage03
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:50997
-
Text
-
ExEcUI1vE SUMMARY At common law a grandparent had no greater right of access to his or her grandchild than did a non-relative. However, it has now become increasingly recognized that a child's best interest can include grandparent visitation, if the child's parents separate or become divorced, or one of the parents dies. Accordingly, some 49 states have now statutorily authorized grand
-
-
Title
-
CRS85719Apage06
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:50997
-
Text
-
. ch. 110.5, s 11-7.1. gj Mont. Code § 40-9-102, N.D. Cent. Code § 14-O9—O5.1. Wash. Rev. Code § 26.09.240. It is doubtful, however, that a court in these jurisdictions woul authorize such visitation over the objection of the grandchi1d's parents as lon as the parents‘ marriage was intact. The parents and their family unit, which ordinarily defined so as to not include grandparents, have
Pages