Search results

(166,241 - 166,260 of 183,293)

Pages

CRS85719Apage15
Title
CRS85719Apage15
Page from
info:fedora/mu:50997
Text
17, 1985
CRS86610ENRpage06
Title
CRS86610ENRpage06
Page from
info:fedora/mu:61767
Text
LAND IN FARMS AVERAGE SIZE 0F FARMS CCCCCC C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C3 C O C C C C C C C C C Q C C C C C Q C C C C C O C C C C C C C Q C C C C C C C C C O Q C C C CO 1980 1981 1982‘ 1983 1984 1985 1/ THOUSANDS 2,433 2,434 2,401 2,370 2.328 2.285 THOUSAND ACRES 1,038,885 1,034,190 1,027,795 1,024,195 1,019,378 1.015.383 1/ PRELIMINARY. Source: B
CRS86610ENRpage20
Title
CRS86610ENRpage20
Page from
info:fedora/mu:61767
Text
Payments 5;? 12.5 55% 1&0 §, 15 35; so as o Very Smut! Smatl Medium Large size at Farms Source: A
CRS86610ENRpage03
Title
CRS86610ENRpage03
Page from
info:fedora/mu:61767
Text
ABSTRACT The charts and graphs in this report provide a brief look at U.S. farm operations, their importance to the U.S. economfi; recent financial problems on the farm, and Federal agriculture program spending. They were compiled from selected publications of the U;$. Department of Agriculture and the General Accounting Office.
CRS86610ENRpage17
Title
CRS86610ENRpage17
Page from
info:fedora/mu:61767
Text
FEDERAL FARM SP ENDING
U.S. agricultural statistics at a glance
Title
U.S. agricultural statistics at a glance: Selected USDA and GAO charts
Date
1986
Summary
The charts and graphs in this report provide a brief look at U.S. farm operations, their importance to the U.S. economy, recent financial problems on the farm, and Federal agriculture program spending. They were compiled from selected publications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the General Accounting Office.
CRS85894Apage13
Title
CRS85894Apage13
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80920
Text
l this section. cns-11 (1) When it is necessary for a person to reside as a medicaid patient in s a licensed skilled nursing facility or licensed intermediate care facility as. . ., such person's relatives as described in this section shall be responsibile to the extent of their ability to repay the department of health and welfare for the cost of necessary medical or remedial care provided
CRS85894Apage09
Title
CRS85894Apage09
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80920
Text
to third parties who may, thus, sue for reimburse“ A 15/C ment of support furnished. Several have criminal sanctions, e.g. Kentucky ,(Ky. Rev. Stat; § 530.050) and North Carolina (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-326,1). Some states condition the responsibility of the adult children upon their having been , supported in their minor years by the needy parent: Indiana law applies only to ithe adult child "who has
CRS87219Apage04
Title
CRS87219Apage04
Page from
info:fedora/mu:39689
Family responsibility laws
Title
Family responsibility laws
Date
1985
CRS85894Apage12
Title
CRS85894Apage12
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80920
Text
cas-1o conceived out of wedlock] as to expenses described therein. If the relation pprior in order shall not be able, the next in order shall be liable, and several relations of the same order shall, if able, contribute according to their means. Del. Code Ann. tit. 13 § 503. (a) The duties of support specified in § 501 and § 504 of this title shall be performed according to the following order
CRS85894Apage21
Title
CRS85894Apage21
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80920
Text
cns-19 West Virginia iThe relatives of an indigent person, who are of sufficient ability, shall be liable to support such person in the manner required by the depart- ment of welfare [department of human services] and to pay the expenses of burial when he dies, in the following order: (1) The children. (2) The father. (3) The brothers and sisters. (4) The mother. The commissioner may proceed
CRS85894Apage15
Title
CRS85894Apage15
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80920
Text
...................... 101 72 ‘ 58 s 50 36 29 2 14 0 0 O 740 to 869.... ................ .. 130 101 86 79 65 9 58 43 29 14 0 870 to 1024.................... 144 1309 115 108 94 86 72 ‘ 58 43 29 1025‘u>1179 ............... w 144 144 144 144 130 123 108 94 79 65 1180 to 1339 ................ .. 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 130 115 101 1340 and up ............ ..,. 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 130 Miss. CodeAnn. § 43
CRS85894Apage22
Title
CRS85894Apage22
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80920
Text
~.... win. a ‘H Ii. V?
CRS87258EPWpage40
Title
CRS87258EPWpage40
Page from
info:fedora/mu:47009
Text
medical practice differences from State-to-State. V flj Wennberg, J. E. Dealing with medical practice variations a proposal for action. Health Affairs. v. 3, no. 2. Summer, 1984. pp. 6-32; i~ i *
CRS87258EPWpage28
Title
CRS87258EPWpage28
Page from
info:fedora/mu:47009
Text
CRS-22 TABLE 1. (continued) Comparison of 1984 Scope of work To 1986 Scope of Work Review Area 1984 1986 Validation of Objectivesi Hospital No- tices Specialityi ihospital Review Admission Pattern Monitoring Intensified Review Community Outreach Not in contracts. 100 percent where patient or physician disagrees. 100 per- cent where patient is liable. 10 percent of remaining. Proposed by each PRO
CRS87258EPWpage16
Title
CRS87258EPWpage16
Page from
info:fedora/mu:47009
Text
CRS*l0 III. MAJOR PROGRAM FEATURES if A. General Overview Hospitals are required to enter into agreements with Peer Review Organi- zations (PROS) as a condition for receiving payments under Medicare's prospective payment system for inpatient hospital services. PROs review the services provided to Medicare patients to assure that services are medically necessary, provided_ in the appropriate
CRS87258EPWpage06
Title
CRS87258EPWpage06
Page from
info:fedora/mu:47009
CRS87258EPWpage34
Title
CRS87258EPWpage34
Page from
info:fedora/mu:47009
Text
the limited or basic levels) suggest Problems in quality of care, the level of review could be increased to the third level, "intensified reviewi"iiUnder this level, the samples of cases reviewed would be increased even more; for exampley 100 percent of all cases having any of 13 conditions, 6 percent of alladmissions, and 100 percent of all readmissionsg i yt HMOs and CMPS would move from one
CRS87258EPWpage32
Title
CRS87258EPWpage32
Page from
info:fedora/mu:47009
Text
that risk-contracting plans may reduce their utilization and costs such that the quality of care provided willdecline. In order to qualify for a risk contract, the HMO or CMP must have an on-going internal quality assurance program. Prior to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), sthere was no specific legislation requirement for any independent, outside review of services

Pages