(166,561 - 166,580 of 182,103)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS84846Apage01
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77360
-
Text
-
k_ 9%/é3"H> /1 . I ,, f‘‘ T Congressional Research Service LC 1418/3' ” The Library of ‘Congress T 554 r-84M u N WV 152% :1...faB 261:. meme. rwm. KESIER A M Washifigten kéniverséfiy I I LEGALITY OF RECEIVING SATELLITE SIGNALS CARRYING CABLE PROGRAMS David R. Siddall Legislative Attorney American Law Division December 14, 1984 Lt’r~.'z’r‘i ~14 I go-
-
-
Title
-
Summary and analysis of the education amendments of 1984, p.l. 98-511
-
Date
-
1984
-
Summary
-
The Education Amendments of 1984 extends and amends a variety of Federal education programs and would establish other new Federal education activities. This paper provides a summary and analysis of these amendments including provisions regarding the adult education, bilingual education, impact aid, women's educational equity, Indian education, emergency immigrant education, and higher education student financial assistance programs.
-
-
Title
-
CRS84846Apage09
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:77360
-
Text
-
Television v. 3&3 TV, 644 F.2d 820 (9th Cir. 1981); Movie Systems v. Heller, 710 F.2d 492 (8th Cir. 1983); Home Box Office v. Advanced Consumer Technology, 549 F.Supp. 14 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
-
-
Title
-
CRS84769EPWpage16
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:80024
-
Text
-
- rolled expired September 30, 1983. The 3(b) payments and section 5(a)(2) pay- ments as well as all other provisions of P.L. 81-874 and P.L. 81-815 would be extended by these amendments. Total authorizations for appropriations for the combined impact aid pro-; grams are $740 million for FY 1985, $760 million for FY 1986, $780 million for FY 1987 and $800 million for FY 1988. By comparison, total
-
-
Title
-
CRS84769EPWpage24
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:80024
-
Text
-
-éAdministration Such sums as may be necessary for each fiscal year 345,000,000 3/ (plus an additional unspecified amount for Indian felé lowships) $8,000,000 Indefinite 3/ This part B authorization total is the sum of three separate part B authorizations under sec. 100S(g)(1) and sec. 100S(g)(2).of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (P.L. 89-10, as amended) and sec. 422 of title IV of P.L. 92-318, as amended.
-
-
Title
-
CRS84769EPWpage30
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:80024
-
Text
-
CRS-24 TITLE VII-GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND ORGANIZATION Office of Migrant Education Title VII of the Education Amendments of 1984 amends the Department of Education Organization Act by establishing an Office of Migrant Education within the existing structure of the Department's Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. The migrant education office would be directly respon- sible
-
-
Title
-
CRS84769EPWpage18
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:80024
-
Text
-
, all sections of P.L. 81-815, the Act relating to the construc- tion of school facilities in areas affected by Federal activities, are extended from FY 1985 through FY 1988 under these amendments.- Authorizations for appro- priations are "such sums as may be necessary" for each of these fiscal years. These authorization levels are similar to those established prior to the enact- ment
-
-
Title
-
CRS84769EPWpage05
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:80024
-
Text
-
'S EDUCATIONAL EQUITY (TITLE Iv)................................... INDIAN EDUCATION (TITLE v)..............................;............... VI)O’OCOCOOOOCOCCOOO0.000000000000000 IQGENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND ORGANIZATION (TITLE VIII)--including Student Financial Assistance, Office of Migrant Education, and Conf1ict-of- Provisj-OIISOOOOOOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 10 13 16 . 19 25
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage29
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
provide the impetus for polluters to comply. Also, like H.R. 3400, the generation tax would be easy to collect. H.R. 4483 has the most certainty regarding administration and the most uncertainty regarding compliance. By placing the tax on sulfur content of coal, administration would be easier than for S. 2001. Also, technically, there is no reduction requirement in which to comply.’ However, whether one
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage39
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
....... -; - - - - - 709.814 831.78£ ' KILOWATF-HOUR SALES Sales lo Ultimate Consumers. Residential sales ................... - - 4.463.146.5811 5.955.980.112 xmnercial and indmtnal sales. Small «or commercial: sales ...... - - -- -- - 4.148.989.5159 (215.07 1.926 Lane 101- industrlallaals .......... -_-- 8.062.l71.‘?24 7.m.s12.937 ‘Public street and highway lighting ........ - - 148550.649 152509.101 {Sales
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage28
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
two reductions. Much the same can be said for stage one of H.R. 4404, although the emphasis on industrial sources to achieve the ”extra 2 million tons and exemptions for low-income persons could add significant complexity to administration and compliance efforts, particularly with respect to stage two reductions. Administration and compliance with S. 2001 is almost totally dependent on the EPA
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage50
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
without a Top-S0 plant in meeting the reduction requirement. As was the case with CEI, it is assumed that the PUC does not reallocate the costs, but does prevent Gulf Power from selling its excess S02 reduction. The cost of H.R. 3400 to Florida Power would be the l-mill fee (1985-1996), 10 percent of the capital cost of installing FGD on Crystal River Units 1 and 2 (enters rate base in l990
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage25
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
CRS-23 requirements. This allocation benefits the Northeast, which has more diverse sources of S02, and penalizes the Midwest, whose S02 emissions are concentrated in the utility sector. For example, in 1980 Tennessee emitted about 1,076,000 tons of 802 while New York emitted about 944,000 tons. However, under most allocation formulas, Tennessee would have to reduce its total emissions by about
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage37
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
is mostly fossil’ fired, their plants emit considerable amounts of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. In 1980, CEI reports emitting about 341,400 tons of S02, about 16 percent of Ohio's total utility SO2 emissions. Most of this came from three power stations: (1) Ashtabula Units 5-9 (440 MW, 74,900 tons), (2) Avon Lake Units 6-9 (1085 MW, 95,400 tons), and, (3) Eastlake Units 1-5 (977 MW, 135,900
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage15
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
collected are to % come from stationary sources of S02, onersixth from stationary sources of Nox, and one-sixth from mobile sources of Nox. Assuming constant 1980 emissions for the 10-year period, this formula works out to roughly $104 a ton for S02 emissions and $63 a ton for Non emissions. As indicated earlier, this tax is considerably lower than the punitive tax suggested by Representative Aspin.
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage02
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
approach, embodied in S. 2dOl, would imposed an emissionrbased itax on all emitters of S02 and Nox including mobile sources. This would not provide much assistance to the Midwest, since it is a major industrial emitter of Nox and 802 as well as a utility emitter of S02/Nox. A second sulfur tax proposal, H.R. 4483, would use a sulfur tax as an incentive for polluters to reduce S02 emissions on their own
-
-
Title
-
CRS84521ENRpage16
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:84136
-
Text
-
CRS-15 Hence, H.R. 4483 and S. 2001 are using a sulfur tax for fundamentally different purposes. H;R.o4483 is using the tax as an economic force to cause reductions in S02 emissions, and to encourage use of technology in making those reductions. S. 2001 is using a suifur tax as a revenue device to enable limited cost*sharing~and fund ai1O million ton reduetion.
-
-
Title
-
CRS87325Apage11
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:75489
-
Text
-
Rico v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico,22 the Court upheld a Puerto Rican ordinance which 20 lg: at 563, citing Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1, 13, 15-16 (l979)(upholding state ban on the use of trade names by optometric offices after state was able to document that users of trade names could easily manipulate them in such a way as to mislead the public), and Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass'n, 437 U
Pages