Search results

(166,621 - 166,640 of 182,695)

Pages

CRS84777Epage11
Title
CRS84777Epage11
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
taxes including State unemployment taxes deposited with the U.S. Treasury formed the base for determining the proportion of Federal taxes paid by residents of each State and the District of Columbia as shown in table 1. 2/ On the expenditure side, the State summary of Federal expenditures is not as comprehensive as the Census Bureau's own reporting of the Federal Government expenditures in its
CRS84777Epage16
Title
CRS84777Epage16
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
,337 29 3,127 12 Ohio _2,439 23 2,435 38 Oklahoma 2,491 19 2,355 43 Oregon 2,258 34 2,335 45 Pennsylvania 2,482 20 2,786 20 Rhode Island 2,435 24 2,946 15 South Carolina 1,792 49 2,547 33 South Dakota 1,900 44 2,751 23 Tennessee 1,976 40 2,757 22 Texas 2,728 15 2,347 44 Utah 1,845 46 2,540 34 Vermont 2,027 38 2,550 32 Virginia 2,530 17 0 4,503 2 Washington 2,748 14 3,555 9 West Virginia 1,944 41 2
CRS84777Epage13
Title
CRS84777Epage13
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
capita basis, the total Federal tax payments in seventeen States and the District of Columbia were above the U.S. average for fiscal year 1983 of $2,500. These States, with the percentage of the U.S. per capita in paren- theses, are as follows: Alaska (158), Connecticut (138), District of Columbia (133), New Jersey (127), Wyoming (117), Illinois (115), Maryland (113), Dela- ware (113), Nevada (112
CRS84777Epage24
Title
CRS84777Epage24
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
,725 2.15 North Dakota 680 0.29 7,724 L 0.28 Ohio 10,746 4.59 120,936 4.43 Oklahoma 3,298 1.41 36,896 1.35 Oregon 2,662 1.14 29,065 1.06 Pennsylvania 11,895 5.08 136,912 5.01 Rhode Island 955 0.41. 10,992 0.40 South Carolina 3,264 1.40 29,224) 1.07 South Dakota 700 0.30 6,792 0.25 Tennessee 4,685 2.00 43,867 1.61 Texas 15,724 6.72 184,003 6.74 Utah 1,619 0.69 14,618 0.54 Vermont 525 0.22 , 5,272 0.19
CRS84777Epage15
Title
CRS84777Epage15
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
Colorado 2,756 12 2,824 19 Connecticut 3,453 2 3,750 8 Delaware 2,814 8 2,573 31 District of Columbia 3,347 3 18,472 1 Florida 2,399 26 3,047 13 Georgia 2,049 37 2,580 30 Hawaii 2,464 22 3,929 5 Idaho ' 1,838 41 2,420 39 Illinois 2,873 6 2,489 35 Indiana 2,307 30 2,199 50 Iowa 2,279 32 2,250 47 Kansas 2,626 16 2,938 16 Kentucky 1,889 45 2,376 42 Louisiana 2,349 28 2,326 46 Maine 1,905 43 2,679 28
CRS84777Epage34
Title
CRS84777Epage34
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
District of Columbia 1.41 1.71 Florida 7.30 4.84 Georgia 2.12 2.20 Hawaii 0.53 0.60 Idaho 0.35 0.36 Illinois 4.03 4.25 Indiana 1.66 1.79 Iowa 1.28 0.97 Kansas 1.09 1.06 Kentucky 1.32 1.31 Louisiana 2.64 1.53 Maine 0.41 0.46 §/ Anton, T. J. The Regional Distribution of Federal Expenditures, 1971-1980. National Tax Journal, v. 36, no. 4, December 1983. p. 429-442.
CRS84777Epage12
Title
CRS84777Epage12
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
on Legislation and National Security. Hearing on the Consolidated Federal Funds Report Act of 1982. 97th Congress, 1st sess., September 21, 1984. p. 19. The Deputy Director of OMB gives the reasons for the new reporting system and the discontinuation of the old. '5“
CRS84777Epage31
Title
CRS84777Epage31
Page from
info:fedora/mu:80094
Text
Procurement 120 51 (IN) 1,127 (NM) 43 5 (Nondefense) All Other 70 8 (WV) 536 (ND) 11 2 The data in table 8 indicate that per capita Federal expenditures for defense functions during fiscal year 1983 were below the U.S. average of $778 in 33 of the 50 States and ranged from $122 in West Virginia to $2,503 in Virginia. The West Virginia total is equivalent to 16 percent of the U.S. average and to 5 percent
CRS84508ENRpage21
Title
CRS84508ENRpage21
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
Text
or taste its presence in water; while this level of gasoline does not seem to be toxic, it nevertheless makes the water containing it objectionable as a drinking water supply. Higher concentra- tions may become toxic, and when concentrations reach levels of around 10,000 parts per million in the air, the gasoline reaches an explosive threshold. Preventing Underground Storage Tank Leakage To prevent
CRS84508ENRpage39
Title
CRS84508ENRpage39
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
Text
CRS-17 storage of one of the most common groundwater contaminants--gasoline--is un- regulated because it is not a waste product (and thus not under the authority of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act), and spills of the fuel cannot be cleaned up under the Superfund law because it is a petroleum product. Fewer than a dozen States have underground storage tank laws or regulations
CRS84508ENRpage33
Title
CRS84508ENRpage33
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
Text
storage tanks and to be in a position to respond quickly to spills and leaks. Exxon Company, for example, claims to have spent over $100 million since 1979 to replace steel underground storage tanks, and the company expects to have replaced all of its old tanks by 1986; Chevron is involved in a five-year, $105 million replacement program. §l:§}/ Some companies are experimenting with added protection
CRS84508ENRpage01
Title
CRS84508ENRpage01
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
Text
84-508 ENR <~%< =Cfu Congressional Research Service l T i The Li bra F)’ of Congress l /) 2 I V? \ ) N 0 Washington, D.C. 20540 3L1L“50g'E5\-3E . NP%§gNGER Wmngton Einivemity LEARING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS: A POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROfiLEM :53’ Donald V. Feliciano Analyst in Environmental Policy Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division January ll, l984n_ mean-sq
CRS84508ENRpage35
Title
CRS84508ENRpage35
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
Text
CR5-l5 Southern States used the fire prevention codes prescribed by the Building Officials and Code Administrators International (BOCA). Local ordinances in States, including Maryland, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Kansas, and Ohio, require periodic tank testing for leaks. §£/ _.}_l_+_/ Ibid.
CRS84508ENRpage18
Title
CRS84508ENRpage18
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
Text
A‘:
CRS84508ENRpage28
Title
CRS84508ENRpage28
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
CRS84508ENRpage08
Title
CRS84508ENRpage08
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
CRS84508ENRpage20
Title
CRS84508ENRpage20
Page from
info:fedora/mu:84055
CRS85985EPWpage22
Title
CRS85985EPWpage22
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81148
Text
CRS-19 Corporation study of Alum Rock and other alternative public school programs, "[D]istricts can help the less advantaged families understand the system more quickly by keeping it stable, tailoring their strategies for disseminating infor- mation to fit the habits and preferences of different subpopulations, and lower- ing the costs of information gathering for parents.“ lg], In contrast
CRS85985EPWpage12
Title
CRS85985EPWpage12
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81148
Text
and typical public school systems, and as such will be further discussed in the final section of this paper. EEE SPECIFIC CONCEPT OF CHAPTER 1 VOUCHERS Chapter 1 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act of 1981 is a modification of the Federal program of aid for the education of the disadvantaged children first enacted as title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Under chapter
CRS85746EPWpage38
Title
CRS85746EPWpage38
Page from
info:fedora/mu:64563
Text
~ «. . . . . ¢ . , \ , . .. _ T u.. _. . ». ., . . O _.. .. . N. . . . n .. ~ V. . 1 V... . . . K . ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ 3‘ “ H ‘ 1 ll Ir ‘ H”! Jn>I\,w;[‘ur$ ‘n‘Jn{x3\xx ‘ “I ‘ “‘ ‘ ix!“ ‘ ‘:1. . FF} ‘ ‘ “ ,. ‘ . . . . . ‘

Pages