(167,281 - 167,300 of 182,314)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS86545EPWpage11
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56635
-
Text
-
;secular humanist" conspiratorial organizations extending chronologically back as far as the Enlightenment or even the Renaissance, ;/ all appear to, 1/ See, for example, Blumenfeld, Samuel L. Is Public Education Necessary? and Tim LaHaye. The Battle for the Public Schools.
-
-
Title
-
CRS86545EPWpage39
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56635
-
Text
-
support for education in the sciences and mathematics, among other purposes, an ;§/ Congressional Record, May 12, 1976. p. 13532. l§/ House Report No. 94-1701. p. 211.
-
-
Title
-
CRS86545EPWpage29
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56635
-
Text
-
;religion" in legal terms. §[ §/ For discussions of these cases and related issues, see Melnick, Robert . Russell. Secularism in the Law: The Religion of Secular Humanism. Ohio Northern University Law Review, April 1981. p. 329-357; and Paul James Toscano. A Dubious Neutrality: The Establishment of Secularism in the Public Schools. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1979. p. 177-211.
-
-
Title
-
CRS86545EPWpage01
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56635
-
Text
-
AEIE'_rY oE j ‘, ‘MEANINGS, AND REFERENCES IN EEDEEAL‘EDUcAEIoN LEGISLATION 4 Wayne Riddle Specialist in Education Education and Public Welfare Division January 31, 1986 gfie €§%€%§fi£ i ' ” t P’breafions Q if @ :Governm.en u no '%H§f»;~;% Uni? ’ i‘ A l Kéfi ’ x%s‘<\‘°“e’ E%e;E¥€%“@‘Q$ Ave 0 2 1994} Washington Umversity Libraries St. Louis, MO 63139
-
-
Title
-
CRS86545EPWpage35
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56635
-
Text
-
D CRSF15h allowed by the courts.‘ Pupils have often been exempted from school requires , ments that impinge on their religious beliefs.i Further, under provisions of . "The Equal Access Act." title VIII of P.L. 98-377, public secondary schools in districts receiving Federal assistance must provide equal access to school 0 facilities by student religious groups during non
-
-
Title
-
CRS83557EPWpage21
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:87381
-
Text
-
of a district's Federal funding was at stake if it were found not to be in compliance with the title. 2/ For a review of current legislative action, see U.S. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Emergency School Aid Act: Deseg- regation Aid Considered by the 98th Congress. Issue Brief No. lB83094, by Jim Stedman, May 31, 1983 (updated regularly). Washington, 1983. Litigation
-
-
Title
-
CRS83557EPWpage09
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:87381
-
Text
-
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin in federally-financed programs), or a voluntary effort to desegregate. CONSOLIDATION OF ESAA 0 Under provisions of chapter 2 of the Education Consolidation and Improve- ment Act (ECIA) of 1981 (title V, subtitle D of the Omnibus Budget Reconcilia- - tion Act of l98l, P.L. 97-35), the authorizations
-
-
Title
-
CRS83557EPWpage05
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:87381
-
Text
-
discretionary authority by the Commissioner of Education). Effective October 1, 1982, ESAA was repealed and its various programs included among the activities that local educational agencies can carry out with funds provided under a new Federal education block grant. This paper provides a brief discus- sion of ESAA and the impact its consolidation with other Eederal education programs in the block grant has
-
-
Title
-
CRS83557EPWpage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:87381
-
Text
-
and FY 1982 than in the previous period. Indeed, for 8 of the 13 dis- tricts in the sample with ESAA awards in excess of $1 million, their FY 1981 ESAA funding exceeded their entire chapter 2 allocation for FY 1982. pTable 1, below, is derived from the Jung and Bartell study and shows the following data for each of their sample districts-FY 1981 ESAA funding, FY 1982 chapter 2 funding, percent change
-
-
Title
-
CRS85661Apage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:53597
-
Text
-
whites after that); United States v. City of Chicago, 663 F.2d 1354 (7th Cir. 1981) (en banc) (40% minority quota for promotions in Chicago police department reduced to 25% since nondiscriminatory exam yielded 25.8% minority group eligibility roster; original quota was unfair to non-minorities); EEOC v. AT&T Co., 556 F.2d 167 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied 433 u.s. 915 (1978) (pro- motion goals
-
-
Title
-
CRS85661Apage06
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:53597
-
Text
-
and Mail Deliverers' Union, 514 F.2d 767, 772-74 (2d Cir., 1975), EEOC v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., 556 F.2d 167, 177-80 (3d Cir. 1977), or dismiss the debate that "goals" are legal and "quotas" are illegal as7a "semantic dispute." United States v. City of Miami, 614 F.2d l322,.l335 n. 26 (5th Cir. 1980). See, also, Regents of the Univ. of Cal, V. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265
-
-
Title
-
CRS85661Apage12
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:53597
-
Text
-
. In the Fullilove case, however, the Court upheld a provision in the Public Works Employment Act of 1977 that required State or local governments to use 10% of Federal funds granted for public works contracts to procure services or sup- plies from businesses owned or controlled by statutorily defined minority groups. _The 6 to 3 decision removes any doubts regarding the power of Con- 'gress to mandate
Pages