Search results

(168,301 - 168,320 of 183,322)

Pages

CRS85746EPWpage36
Title
CRS85746EPWpage36
Page from
info:fedora/mu:64563
CRS85746EPWpage34
Title
CRS85746EPWpage34
Page from
info:fedora/mu:64563
CRS85746EPWpage28
Title
CRS85746EPWpage28
Page from
info:fedora/mu:64563
Text
*...!
CRS87171Epage06
Title
CRS87171Epage06
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
87-70 (June 30, 1961). 11/ Section 503 of Public Law 88-560 (September 2, l964). ;g/ Section 80l(d)(4) of Public Law 91-609 (December 31, 1970). 1§/ Section 510 of Public Law 98-181 (November 30, 1983). 13/ Section 513 of Public Law 98-181 (November 30, 1983).
CRS87171Epage13
Title
CRS87171Epage13
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
) ------ Basic laws on housing and community development; revised through October 1, 1981. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1981. 830 p. (97th Congress, lst session. House. Report no. op 97-9) A ----- Document room. Home owners‘ loan acts and housing acts: Volume I, July 1932 - December 1966. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1971. 1040 p. ------ Home owners‘ loan acts and housing acts: Volume II, 90th
CRS87171Epage03
Title
CRS87171Epage03
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
to reduce the interest rate to as low as 1 percent. 4] The Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970 enabled 1/ Public Law 81-171 (July 15, 1949). I: Section 801 of Public Law 87-70 (June 30, 1961). 1:: Section 1001 of Public Law 89-117 (August 10, 1965). '£ Section 1001 of Public Law 90-448 (August 1, 1968).
CRS87171Epage14
Title
CRS87171Epage14
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
CRS87171Epage12
Title
CRS87171Epage12
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
CR3‘-10 TABLE 8. Activity under the Section 525 Program, FY1979 - 1981 Fiscal Year Appropriations ($000) 1979 if 3 2950-0 1980 1,500 1981 1,000 Source: Farmers Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agricul- ture. SUMMARY AND PROSPECT FOR CONTINUATION or RURAL HOUSING PROGRAMS As originally enacted, the Housing Act of 1949 authorized FmHA to make loans and grants to farm owners to construct
CRS87171Epage08
Title
CRS87171Epage08
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
CRS*6 TABLE 4. Activity Under the Section 515 Program, FY1977 ~ 1987 Fiscal Year Loan Obligationsi Units '9 (Millions) 1977 . $ 555 32,056 1978 676 34,300 1979 870 38,650 1980 -1881 33,100 1981 865 29,500 1982 954 30,500 1983 802 24,200 1984 - 919 27,100 1985 0 903 A 1 25,687 A 1986. 652 21,266 1987 (estimate) 670 21,233 Source: Farmers Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agricul~ ture
CRS87171Epage07
Title
CRS87171Epage07
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
CRS*5 TABLE 3. Activity under Sections 514 and S16, FY1977 ~ 1987 Sec. 514 0 Sec. 516 Fiscal Year Loans Units 1] Grants ($000) ($000) 1977 $ 15,336 1,208 $ 7,250 1978 9,998 “,,.512» 7,150 1979 36,329 ‘“ 2,575 ' . 32,428 1980 ' 24,577 1,490 22,279 1981 ’ 18,548 890 10,518 1982 11,911 748 14,948 1983 5 3,994 326 7,544 1984 5,485 402 9,807 1985 17,533 666 12,138 1986 10,675 653 10,850 1987
CRS87171Epage11
Title
CRS87171Epage11
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
CRS-9 TABLE 7. Activity under the Section 524 Program, FY1977 - 1987 Fiscal Year Site Loans A Units 1] ($000) A 1977 $ 1,432 236 1978 1,754 320 1979 2,958 ' 495 1980 822 124 1981 A 454 52 1982 G - . - 1983 _ 310 37 1984 213 - 24 1935 “ “ 1986 A v“ ‘ 1987 (estimate) 574 57 if Site loans contribute building sites. The housing_units built upon these sites are financed through other programs
CRS87171Epage01
Title
CRS87171Epage01
Page from
info:fedora/mu:32636
Text
TECHNICAL AND SUPERVISORY ASSISTANCE (SECTION 525) . . . . . RURAL HOUSING PRESERVATION GRANTS (SECTION 533) . . . . . . SUMMARY AND PROSPECT FOR CONTINUATION OF RURAL HOUSING lpmmmms ... ... ... .-. ... ... ... .- 10 REFERENCES . . . . . . .y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 xoOooo-:a~u1J>wa-- by B. Ellington Foote Analyst in Housing Economics Division Congressional Research Service March 3, 1987
CRS83522Spage09
Title
CRS83522Spage09
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
well-established pri- vate schools may be priced out of the market by the options at the "better" private schools and the public institutions. The impact likely will be greater on the small, largely liberal arts, private colleges--those that generally en- roll fewer than 1,000 students. these institutions, although accounting for over half of the private institutions by number, enroll less
CRS83522Spage22
Title
CRS83522Spage22
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
CRS-18 In the face of a possible shift in Federal policy, the search has begun a- cross the country for alternative ways to help students pay for college. States, educational institutions, private lenders, investment bankers, and others are all engaged in an effort to provide loans that would help fill the gap created by cutbacks in Federal student aid. Loans have the attractive feature of being
CRS83522Spage15
Title
CRS83522Spage15
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
to constructing these higher education l§/ Monsanto Company, Washington University Enter Research Contract. The Washington Post, June 4, 1982. p. A-8; and Philip J. Hilts. Purity vs. Profits: Academia Mulls Conflicts in Biotechnical Field. The Washington Post, June 28, pa A-so 13/ Magarrell, Jack. Give Colleges More, Corporations Urged. The Chronicle of Higher Education, October 7, 1981. p. 3.
CRS83522Spage13
Title
CRS83522Spage13
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
in 1862 and the formation of the Land- Grant college system. The system of the State universities developed with “ research and service as functions coequal with teaching. These additional func- tions made knowledge development an integral part of the university's mission. The American system of public and private higher education is somewhat unique in the western world in its role in the social
CRS83522Spage28
Title
CRS83522Spage28
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
50 years. In 1929-30, private insti- tutions enrolled more than 50 percent of all students, but by 1979-80, this pro- portion had fallen to 22 percent. The decline is not due to a reduction of abso- lute numbers, which actually have quadrupled since 1929-30. Rather, the decline can be viewed as a consequence of the great rise in public enrollment. The prob- lem may be even more severe in view
CRS83522Spage19
Title
CRS83522Spage19
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
-billion dollar pro- grams is being questioned as never before. A variety of public policy makers are scrutinizing not only the_appropriation levels, but also the philosophy, rules, and details of Federal student aid programs. Questions are being raised about issues such as the following: 1. Are some participants sufficiently wealthy that they do not need any form of Federal financial aid? 2. Does the current
CRS83522Spage35
Title
CRS83522Spage35
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
K_ _ .'0 083$ 0 CRS“3l 'hih“)it should assume special responsibility for a*limited number of broad Various spokespersons have expressed different points of view con- ing the following options for Federal action: 0 Development of a nationwide system of higher education that will provide the maximum number of citizens with the opportunity to benefit from postsecondary education
CRS83522Spage14
Title
CRS83522Spage14
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85795
Text
to develop, various concerns have been identified. Discussion items have included (1) selection and faculty status of the research staff; (2) the need for policies when university personnel have a financial interest in a firm supporting their research; (3) restrictions on the ways in which faculty researchers may become involved with the supporting firm; (4) prior review of research reports before

Pages