Search results

(168,761 - 168,780 of 183,154)

Pages

Title: CRS84758Epage12
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473

Title: Survey of use by states of general sales and gross receipts taxes, with emphasis on exemption for food and drugs
Date: 1984
Summary: The general sales or gross receipts tax is the largest single producer of State tax revenues for the 50 States combined, accounting for about 31 percent of total State tax collections in fiscal year 1983. In recent years, the trend has been to exempt food and drug purchases from the tax base while increasing the tax rate on the lower base. This report incorporates the changes in this area during the State legislative sessions of 1984.

Title: CRS84758Epage09
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473
Text: CRS-3 State General Sales/Cross Receipt Tax Rates, Classified by the Inclusion or Exclusion of Food Purchased for Off-Premise Consumption, as of August 31, 1984 Tax a] Number Number (Percent) of States Include Food of States Exclude Food 3-0 6 Georgia, Kansas, 1 Colorado E] I .North Dakota, Okla- homa, 2] Virginia, and Wyoming 3.5 1 Nebraska Q] -4 none 3.75 1 New Mexico - none 4.0 5 Alabama

Title: CRS84758Epage08
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473

Title: CRS84758Epage14
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473

Title: CRS85748Epage02
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019

Title: CRS85748Epage17
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019
Text: nationally. _§/ U.S. Executive Office of tin: President. Office (Hf Management auui Budget. Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 1986. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1985. p. 5~65.

Title: CRS85748Epage09
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019
Text: credit market imperfections. A Second, it can Ix: argued that the proposed PEEK’ is justified CH1 equity grounds, since the distribution of income is too unequal. Credit assistance to small businesses may reduce unemployment and create more small business enter” prises. Third, it can be argued that the FLDP would have advantages over the eXist~ ing direct loan and loan guarantee programs of the Small

Title: CRS85748Epage15
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019
Text: cause a net reduction in available credit to small businesses. Even the desirability of Federal credit assistance to small business de- pends, at least partially, (H1 one's political ideology. For example, in the

Title: CRS85748Epage11
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019
Text: the Federal Government would make loan— able funds available to lending institutions at an interest rate that is 3 per~ cent below the Federal Government's cost of tmmrowing. For example, if the Treasury borrows funds at 12 percent, the Treasury would loan these funds to lending institutions en: a 9 percent rate of interest. The difference between the Treasury's borrowing cost and the Treasury

Title: CRS85748Epage16
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019
Text: ‘£13, I.“ »L‘.b4hrdu.|olu“1nnu‘N\A4vy)t.4ﬂL9\uu «Id .

Title: CRS85748Epage10
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019

Title: CRS85748Epage12
Page from: info:fedora/mu:72019
Text: ‘1.‘.w iv‘ \»x‘WJIJl1‘:; :UI.I“9.

Title: CRS87331ENRpage45
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207
Text: CRS-19 .ou«>uum.suusomom uuaasoum .ousunsu«um< no usuauuauuu .m.= uouuzom ans ass ses mes sms em~ «en q~« ans noa ¢~n.¢ muuuusso .uuou aauuu xsacaun mouox .auuu susum suauaa ouqxox .:uuz sauna mas mos ass sns nms se~ oh“ ems use sac nc~.e uuuauouu .u«~«:u s«uumH< .nasu> uuamm omu auuomwz muuox mam: u«nmum sauna ass anus: ess sud oms cow can now seq one mme.. e~a.s n-.e uuosvouu can

Title: CRS87331ENRpage14
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207

Title: CRS87331ENRpage68
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207

Title: CRS87331ENRpage57
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207
Text: 39 5.45 35 .38 2 3.11 20 .54 3 1979/80 17.31 7.20 42 5.49 32 35 2 3.58 21 .70 4 1980/81 18.85 6.159 33 7.74 41 .41 .2 13.81 20 .74 4 1981/82 20.72 6.27 30 8.35 40 .74 4 4.26 21 1.11 5 91982/83 23.29 6.45 28 8.24 35 1.55 7 5.86 25 1.20 5 1983/84 21.39 4.86 23 7.71 36 2.12 10 5.38 25 1.32 6 1984/85 22.29 4.46 20 8.44 38 2.88 14 5.15 23 1.36 6 1985/86 22.74 5.45 24 7.38 32 3.20 14 5.11% 23 1.60 7 1986/87

Title: CRS87331ENRpage15
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207
Text: large quantities of feed grains, primarily corn. While a debate rages over whether the 1980 grain embargo hurt U.S. exports to the Soviet Union, Soviet imports of U.S. feed grain increased under the Second Long-Term Grain Agreement signed in 1983 because of a continuing strong Soviet demand for feed grain imports. However, the Soviets purchased wheat elsewhere. The large Soviet grain harvest in 1986

Title: CRS87331ENRpage67
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207
Text: 197 27 224 31 53 7 1979 836 228 - 27 81 10 196 23 276 _ 33 55 7 1980 1,096 316 29 170 16 207 4 19 344 31 59 5 1981 1,484 375 25 295 20 290 20 482 32 42 3 1982 _1,370 . 261 19 302 22 312 22 457 33 38 3 1983 1,302 225 17 V 289 22 297 23 457 35 34 3 1984 1,213 209 17 281 23 304 25 385 32 34 3 1985 1,179 211 18 274 23 302 26 346 29 46 4 1986P 1,195 270 - 23 1 251 21 . 329 28 305 26 40 3 1987 1,281 338

Title: CRS87331ENRpage19
Page from: info:fedora/mu:75207
Text: CRS-6 prices of competitor nations, and on the availability of credit at concessional rates. U.S. SHARE OF WORLD MARKETS The decline in the competitiveness of U.S. agricultural exports can be vseen in tables 15 through 24. In 1986, the U.S. world market share was lower in wheat, rice, coarse grains, soybeans and products, cotton, and pork than it was in 1977. U.S. world share of cotton exports

Pages