(169,181 - 169,200 of 183,061)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS84758Epage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81473
-
Text
-
to $8 per person in a household with income in the $14,000 to $20,000 class with a double credit for persons 65 years old or older. The credit for a single taxpayer in Vermont vanishes at $12,000 and for 10 or more dependents at $13,500. Finally, South Dakota and Wyoming limit the tax credits to per- sons 65 years old or older and disabled persons receiving social security payments. In South Dakota
-
-
Title
-
CRS84749EPWpage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81575
-
Text
-
CRS-3 Health Care Block Grant and provides for new income verification procedure for applicants and recipients of the food stamp program._g/ . The following table shows CBO's estimates of the budget impact of eligibil- ity and benefit rule changes in the Deficit Reduction Act for selected social welfare programs. A more detailed table, presenting cost estimates for each ma~ jor provision affecting social welfare programs, is provided in appendix A. ..g/ The food stamp program is not considered an entitlement because of leg- islated appropriation ceilings and legislative provisions for benefit reductions if funding is insufficient. i
-
-
Title
-
CRS86543EPWpage25
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56524
-
Text
-
to expire at the end of taxable year 1986.- There are two methods by which a State can qualify to re- ceive a partial cap on the credit reduction. Under the first method, a State's annual credit reduction is lowered by 0.1 percentage points if the State satis- (fies the first two criteria for the full cap on the credit reduction (listed q above), and one of the remaining two criteria. Under
-
-
Title
-
CRS86543EPWpage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:56524
-
Text
-
CRS-6 2. Legislative-Action Deferral The legislative-action deferral (Section l202(b)(8)(B) of the Social Secur lrity Act of 1935, as amended) was effective October 1, 1982, through September 30,.lS85. When using thisprovision for the first time, a State could defer l 80 percent of the interest due on UI loans if it met two conditions: (1) the State had not acted to reduce it unemployment fund
-
-
Title
-
CRS85818Epage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:52450
-
Text
-
. §/ The steepness of the yield curve in the 1982-.83recovery‘ is indicated by comparing the differences in similar categories of both consumer and commercial loan rates in table 2 with those in table 3. Although the differences between these two categories of loans were greater in the 1980 recovery than in the 1983 recovery, the differences in the latter period exceeded those in the 1975 recovery -- a recovery
-
-
Title
-
CRS85818Epage20
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:52450
-
Text
-
CRS-14 Prior tc>World.War II, banks depended on business loans for a large part of their income. Consumer credit accounted for only 12 percent of total bank loan volume in 1940, as sales finance companies and retail stores each provided as much consumer credit as banks did. By contrast, in 1966, consumer loans repre-A resented about 21 percent of loan volume. A J . 7<vf4T4:" ._ /h Data
-
-
Title
-
CRS85818Epage25
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:52450
-
Text
-
CRS-19 Table 6. Comparison of Deposit and Nondeposit Sources and Interest Costs 2 1981-1978 1981 Percent 1978 Percent 3 Millions ‘Distribution 5 Millions Distributionh $121.6 100.0% 3110.2 100.0% Total Available Funds Demand Deposits 33.2 27.3 35.1 31.9 . Regular Savings Accounts 19.8 16.3 3 30.7 27.8 Other Time Deposits 3]. 44.7 36.8 6 27.7 6 25.1 Nondeposit Accounts bf 23.9 19.6 16.7 15.2
-
-
Title
-
CRS85818Epage32
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:52450
-
Text
-
and assuming that the bulk of consumer loans were of three years’ duration,then loans wereprobably not correctly priced in the years 1979, 1980 and 1981.~ To achieve the average profit margin of 2.89 percent in 1981, given the loan rates of l979 and 1980, banks would have had to raise consumer loan rates by about 1.17 percentage points in 1981, causing rates on average to rise to about 17.75 percent from
-
-
Title
-
CRS85818Epage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:52450
-
Text
-
CRS-4 II. BEHAVIOR OF BANK CONSUMER LOAN RATES A. May 1982 to May 1983 Table 2 illustrates the behavior of consumer. loan rates compared to commer-- cial loan rates charged by commercial banks during the period from May 1982 to May 1983. As monthly data on rates on new car loans were available four. times a 1 year and as these loans represent the bulk in dollar terms of consumer install- ment
-
-
Title
-
CRS85818Epage27
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:52450
-
Text
-
- - . . ~ - . . - - . . u . u . n o . . . . . . - . . .. . . . ' a o . . . o - . . a . .- 3. ‘S-1* ‘-3 Lmfifies H"-5 -:21;-an :3. rr. . kmpenfiefi ;':.«':__¢.".’.;;g2:1i*. 0 :---'.’. §‘-3u=2- ‘rt I 5: :. 5‘ 1: 3; :3. 11. 2L. JL -LJL
Pages