Search results

(169,281 - 169,300 of 183,499)

Pages

Title: CRS84749EPWpage09
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81575
Text: CRS-2 increasing the premium payment for beneficiaries enrolled in the Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) program; requires States to expand Medicaid eligibility for low-income preg- nant women and children; makes changes to increase benefits for some low-income persons who work. These changes include raising the gross income eligibility limit for working recipients of AFDC, increasing

Title: CRS84758Epage17
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473
Text: to $8 per person in a household with income in the $14,000 to $20,000 class with a double credit for persons 65 years old or older. The credit for a single taxpayer in Vermont vanishes at $12,000 and for 10 or more dependents at $13,500. Finally, South Dakota and Wyoming limit the tax credits to per- sons 65 years old or older and disabled persons receiving social security payments. In South Dakota

Title: CRS84749EPWpage10
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81575
Text: CRS-3 Health Care Block Grant and provides for new income verification procedure for applicants and recipients of the food stamp program._g/ . The following table shows CBO's estimates of the budget impact of eligibil- ity and benefit rule changes in the Deficit Reduction Act for selected social welfare programs. A more detailed table, presenting cost estimates for each ma~ jor provision affecting social welfare programs, is provided in appendix A. ..g/ The food stamp program is not considered an entitlement because of leg- islated appropriation ceilings and legislative provisions for benefit reductions if funding is insufficient. i

Title: CRS84758Epage18
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473

Title: CRS84758Epage16
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473

Title: CRS84758Epage06
Page from: info:fedora/mu:81473

Title: CRS86543EPWpage25
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524
Text: to expire at the end of taxable year 1986.- There are two methods by which a State can qualify to re- ceive a partial cap on the credit reduction. Under the first method, a State's annual credit reduction is lowered by 0.1 percentage points if the State satis- (fies the first two criteria for the full cap on the credit reduction (listed q above), and one of the remaining two criteria. Under

Title: CRS86543EPWpage30
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524
Text: LIBRARY as WASHINGTDN UMVER-smr ST. Lguls —. Mo.

Title: CRS86543EPWpage28
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524
Text: M‘

Title: CRS86543EPWpage04
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524
Text: .1111

Title: CRS86543EPWpage17
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524
Text: CRS-6 2. Legislative-Action Deferral The legislative-action deferral (Section l202(b)(8)(B) of the Social Secur lrity Act of 1935, as amended) was effective October 1, 1982, through September 30,.lS85. When using thisprovision for the first time, a State could defer l 80 percent of the interest due on UI loans if it met two conditions: (1) the State had not acted to reduce it unemployment fund

Title: CRS86543EPWpage18
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524

Title: CRS86543EPWpage10
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524

Title: CRS86543EPWpage08
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524

Title: CRS86543EPWpage12
Page from: info:fedora/mu:56524
Text: uni ».l5|lf«\f4 : .J

Title: CRS85818Epage17
Page from: info:fedora/mu:52450
Text: . §/ The steepness of the yield curve in the 1982-.83recovery‘ is indicated by comparing the differences in similar categories of both consumer and commercial loan rates in table 2 with those in table 3. Although the differences between these two categories of loans were greater in the 1980 recovery than in the 1983 recovery, the differences in the latter period exceeded those in the 1975 recovery -- a recovery

Title: CRS85818Epage20
Page from: info:fedora/mu:52450
Text: CRS-14 Prior tc>World.War II, banks depended on business loans for a large part of their income. Consumer credit accounted for only 12 percent of total bank loan volume in 1940, as sales finance companies and retail stores each provided as much consumer credit as banks did. By contrast, in 1966, consumer loans repre-A resented about 21 percent of loan volume. A J . 7<vf4T4:" ._ /h Data

Title: CRS85818Epage25
Page from: info:fedora/mu:52450
Text: CRS-19 Table 6. Comparison of Deposit and Nondeposit Sources and Interest Costs 2 1981-1978 1981 Percent 1978 Percent 3 Millions ‘Distribution 5 Millions Distributionh $121.6 100.0% 3110.2 100.0% Total Available Funds Demand Deposits 33.2 27.3 35.1 31.9 . Regular Savings Accounts 19.8 16.3 3 30.7 27.8 Other Time Deposits 3]. 44.7 36.8 6 27.7 6 25.1 Nondeposit Accounts bf 23.9 19.6 16.7 15.2

Title: CRS85818Epage32
Page from: info:fedora/mu:52450
Text: and assuming that the bulk of consumer loans were of three years’ duration,then loans wereprobably not correctly priced in the years 1979, 1980 and 1981.~ To achieve the average profit margin of 2.89 percent in 1981, given the loan rates of l979 and 1980, banks would have had to raise consumer loan rates by about 1.17 percentage points in 1981, causing rates on average to rise to about 17.75 percent from

Title: CRS85818Epage10
Page from: info:fedora/mu:52450
Text: CRS-4 II. BEHAVIOR OF BANK CONSUMER LOAN RATES A. May 1982 to May 1983 Table 2 illustrates the behavior of consumer. loan rates compared to commer-- cial loan rates charged by commercial banks during the period from May 1982 to May 1983. As monthly data on rates on new car loans were available four. times a 1 year and as these loans represent the bulk in dollar terms of consumer install- ment

Pages