(169,321 - 169,340 of 183,519)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage128
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
rent. 1/ At that point an aged person, like all other tenants, loses the rent supplement and must pay full market rent. 2 Benefits averaged about $1,760 in FY 1981, 3147 monthly. gy 24 C.F.R. § 215.21 (1982). §/ 24 C.F.R. s 215.20 (e) 1982. 2/ Percentage of income paid toward rent was raised from 25 percent to 30 percent by P.L. 97-35. 2/ This eligibility limit reflects the new rule that basic rent
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage127
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
CRS-111 37. SECTION 101 RENT SUPPLEMENTS _1_/ A. Funding Formula This program is funded 100 percent by the Federal Government. B. Eligibility Requirements Until December 21, 1979, the law made eligible for rent supple- ments tenants whose incomes were within the limits prescribed for admission to local public housing and who were: aged 62 or over or handicapped; displaced by governmental action
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage123
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
loan funds to benefit persons of "low income." 6 The law defines low income as below 80 percent of the median income and requires area and family size adjustments. 1/ Agricul- lture Deparument regulations have established dollar limits by county or district groupings for each State and outlying area. 2/ The range in eligibility limits is from $11,500 to $18,000 (adjusted annual income
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage125
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
CRS-109 36. SECTION 236 INTEREST REDUCTION PAYMENTS if I A. Funding Formula This program is funded 100 percent by the Federal Government. B. Eligibility Requirements The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 makes eligible for Section 236 housing assistance tenants whose incomes are not in excess of 80 percent of the area median income. Originally, in 1968, the limit was 135 percent
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage178
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
the maximum income limit for eligibility at 125 pefcent of the non-farm poverty guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget. Thus, the income limit was $12,375 for a family of four, and $6,075 for a single in- dividual, 3/ effective in February 1983 in the 48 contiguous states, D.C., and Ehe outlying areas, higher in Alaska and Hawaii. Regula- tions permit exceptions to the income limit
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage175
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
CRS-159 (2) If the student has not received financial assistance under the SEOG, CWS, or NDSL program for the 1982-83 award year at the time he applies for a Guaranteed Student Loan, the institution shall calculate the student's expected family contribution under either-- (a) The need analysis system it uses for the SEOG, CWS or NDSL program; or (b) The system used in conjunction
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage171
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
and Puerto Rico. School year 1982-1983 grants (made from fiscal year 1982 appropriations) totaled $5,851,200._l/ The average support per student was approximately $2,540. I if The President's FY 1984 budget requested no funds for this program. . ~
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage172
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
and stipends for room and board and personal expenses. Also, they provide academic and personal counseling, tutoring in basic skills and other subject areas, and various support services. In 1982 CAMP programs served 471 students at six sites in four States. School year 1982-1983 grants (made from fiscal year 1982 appropriations) totaled $1,159,680. 1/ The average support per student was approximately $2
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage176
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
on October 1, 1981, States could receive Federal funding only for services provided to recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Supplemental Security ,Income, 2/ or to individuals and families with incomes below 115 per- cent of the State's median income, 3/ adjusted for household size (from $18,119 in Arkansas to $31,708 in Alaska for a four-person family in FY 1981, according
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage174
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
;family contribution schedule" for the GSL program for instruction periods that begin not later than June 30, 1983. (Federal Register, vol. 47, no. 85, pages 19085-19109). “ As outlined in this "family contribution schedule," the expected family contribution to the cost of education for a GSL applicant whose family income exceeds $30,000 is to be determined in the fol- lowing way: (1) If the student
-
-
Title
-
CRS83110EPWpage177
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:85452
-
Text
-
than any other service. Day care expenditures were expected to amount to $723 million or 18 percent of the total, and to serve an estimated 738,036 individuals. Other leading services and their share of expenditures in fiscal year 1980: home-based services, 14.4 per- cent; substitute care for children, 10 percent; protective services for children, 8.8 percent; day treatment of children and adults, 16
-
-
Title
-
CRS84749EPWpage35
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81575
-
Text
-
CRS-28 within 30 years of a veteran's discharge; and (4) requires that loans under these programs finance only a veteran's principal residence. H. Other Related Amendments to the Tax Code Related amendments to the Tax Code affect: (1) charitable contributions; (2) alimony; (3) private foundations; and (4) welfare benefit plans, cafeteria plans, and other fringe benefits for employees.
-
-
Title
-
CRS84749EPWpage36
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81575
-
Text
-
-$839 “$29172 b) OIOOOOOOOOIOOOIIOOOIOOOO 9- O00000000000OOOOOOOCOOOOOIIOOOOOOO 0 ‘ 20 Working aged 0oooooooooooooooooooooooo 0 ‘$260 ‘$360 ‘$415 ‘$455 ‘$485 ‘$13975 3. Physician freeze a) Medicare ........................ -$40 -$720 -$840 -$950 ‘$950 -$1,000 “$4,500 b) Medicaid oooooooooooooooooooooooo 9- ‘14 ‘l6 ‘I8 ‘18 ‘19 ‘8S Total oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ‘$40 ‘$734 ‘$856 ‘$968 ‘$968 ‘$1,019
-
-
Title
-
CRS84749EPWpage09
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81575
-
Text
-
CRS-2 increasing the premium payment for beneficiaries enrolled in the Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) program; requires States to expand Medicaid eligibility for low-income preg- nant women and children; makes changes to increase benefits for some low-income persons who work. These changes include raising the gross income eligibility limit for working recipients of AFDC, increasing
-
-
Title
-
CRS84758Epage17
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81473
-
Text
-
to $8 per person in a household with income in the $14,000 to $20,000 class with a double credit for persons 65 years old or older. The credit for a single taxpayer in Vermont vanishes at $12,000 and for 10 or more dependents at $13,500. Finally, South Dakota and Wyoming limit the tax credits to per- sons 65 years old or older and disabled persons receiving social security payments. In South Dakota
-
-
Title
-
CRS84749EPWpage10
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:81575
-
Text
-
CRS-3 Health Care Block Grant and provides for new income verification procedure for applicants and recipients of the food stamp program._g/ . The following table shows CBO's estimates of the budget impact of eligibil- ity and benefit rule changes in the Deficit Reduction Act for selected social welfare programs. A more detailed table, presenting cost estimates for each ma~ jor provision affecting social welfare programs, is provided in appendix A. ..g/ The food stamp program is not considered an entitlement because of leg- islated appropriation ceilings and legislative provisions for benefit reductions if funding is insufficient. i
Pages