Search results

(169,641 - 169,660 of 183,533)

Pages

CRS83110EPWpage173
Title
CRS83110EPWpage173
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
and discuss pending issues. In 1981, 2,000 students and teachers received fellowships, at an average cost of $500.
CRS83110EPWpage178
Title
CRS83110EPWpage178
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
the maximum income limit for eligibility at 125 pefcent of the non-farm poverty guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget. Thus, the income limit was $12,375 for a family of four, and $6,075 for a single in- dividual, 3/ effective in February 1983 in the 48 contiguous states, D.C., and Ehe outlying areas, higher in Alaska and Hawaii. Regula- tions permit exceptions to the income limit
CRS83110EPWpage175
Title
CRS83110EPWpage175
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
CRS-159 (2) If the student has not received financial assistance under the SEOG, CWS, or NDSL program for the 1982-83 award year at the time he applies for a Guaranteed Student Loan, the institution shall calculate the student's expected family contribution under either-- (a) The need analysis system it uses for the SEOG, CWS or NDSL program; or (b) The system used in conjunction
CRS83110EPWpage171
Title
CRS83110EPWpage171
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
and Puerto Rico. School year 1982-1983 grants (made from fiscal year 1982 appropriations) totaled $5,851,200._l/ The average support per student was approximately $2,540. I if The President's FY 1984 budget requested no funds for this program. . ~
CRS83110EPWpage172
Title
CRS83110EPWpage172
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
and stipends for room and board and personal expenses. Also, they provide academic and personal counseling, tutoring in basic skills and other subject areas, and various support services. In 1982 CAMP programs served 471 students at six sites in four States. School year 1982-1983 grants (made from fiscal year 1982 appropriations) totaled $1,159,680. 1/ The average support per student was approximately $2
CRS83110EPWpage176
Title
CRS83110EPWpage176
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
on October 1, 1981, States could receive Federal funding only for services provided to recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Supplemental Security ,Income, 2/ or to individuals and families with incomes below 115 per- cent of the State's median income, 3/ adjusted for household size (from $18,119 in Arkansas to $31,708 in Alaska for a four-person family in FY 1981, according
CRS83110EPWpage174
Title
CRS83110EPWpage174
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
;family contribution schedule" for the GSL program for instruction periods that begin not later than June 30, 1983. (Federal Register, vol. 47, no. 85, pages 19085-19109). “ As outlined in this "family contribution schedule," the expected family contribution to the cost of education for a GSL applicant whose family income exceeds $30,000 is to be determined in the fol- lowing way: (1) If the student
CRS83110EPWpage177
Title
CRS83110EPWpage177
Page from
info:fedora/mu:85452
Text
than any other service. Day care expenditures were expected to amount to $723 million or 18 percent of the total, and to serve an estimated 738,036 individuals. Other leading services and their share of expenditures in fiscal year 1980: home-based services, 14.4 per- cent; substitute care for children, 10 percent; protective services for children, 8.8 percent; day treatment of children and adults, 16
CRS84749EPWpage35
Title
CRS84749EPWpage35
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81575
Text
CRS-28 within 30 years of a veteran's discharge; and (4) requires that loans under these programs finance only a veteran's principal residence. H. Other Related Amendments to the Tax Code Related amendments to the Tax Code affect: (1) charitable contributions; (2) alimony; (3) private foundations; and (4) welfare benefit plans, cafeteria plans, and other fringe benefits for employees.
CRS84749EPWpage02
Title
CRS84749EPWpage02
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81575
CRS84749EPWpage36
Title
CRS84749EPWpage36
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81575
Text
-$839 “$29172 b) OIOOOOOOOOIOOOIIOOOIOOOO 9- O00000000000OOOOOOOCOOOOOIIOOOOOOO 0 ‘ 20 Working aged 0oooooooooooooooooooooooo 0 ‘$260 ‘$360 ‘$415 ‘$455 ‘$485 ‘$13975 3. Physician freeze a) Medicare ........................ -$40 -$720 -$840 -$950 ‘$950 -$1,000 “$4,500 b) Medicaid oooooooooooooooooooooooo 9- ‘14 ‘l6 ‘I8 ‘18 ‘19 ‘8S Total oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ‘$40 ‘$734 ‘$856 ‘$968 ‘$968 ‘$1,019
CRS84749EPWpage09
Title
CRS84749EPWpage09
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81575
Text
CRS-2 increasing the premium payment for beneficiaries enrolled in the Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) program; requires States to expand Medicaid eligibility for low-income preg- nant women and children; makes changes to increase benefits for some low-income persons who work. These changes include raising the gross income eligibility limit for working recipients of AFDC, increasing
CRS84758Epage17
Title
CRS84758Epage17
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81473
Text
to $8 per person in a household with income in the $14,000 to $20,000 class with a double credit for persons 65 years old or older. The credit for a single taxpayer in Vermont vanishes at $12,000 and for 10 or more dependents at $13,500. Finally, South Dakota and Wyoming limit the tax credits to per- sons 65 years old or older and disabled persons receiving social security payments. In South Dakota
CRS84749EPWpage10
Title
CRS84749EPWpage10
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81575
Text
CRS-3 Health Care Block Grant and provides for new income verification procedure for applicants and recipients of the food stamp program._g/ . The following table shows CBO's estimates of the budget impact of eligibil- ity and benefit rule changes in the Deficit Reduction Act for selected social welfare programs. A more detailed table, presenting cost estimates for each ma~ jor provision affecting social welfare programs, is provided in appendix A. ..g/ The food stamp program is not considered an entitlement because of leg- islated appropriation ceilings and legislative provisions for benefit reductions if funding is insufficient. i
CRS84758Epage18
Title
CRS84758Epage18
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81473
CRS84758Epage16
Title
CRS84758Epage16
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81473
CRS84758Epage06
Title
CRS84758Epage06
Page from
info:fedora/mu:81473
CRS86543EPWpage25
Title
CRS86543EPWpage25
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56524
Text
to expire at the end of taxable year 1986.- There are two methods by which a State can qualify to re- ceive a partial cap on the credit reduction. Under the first method, a State's annual credit reduction is lowered by 0.1 percentage points if the State satis- (fies the first two criteria for the full cap on the credit reduction (listed q above), and one of the remaining two criteria. Under
CRS86543EPWpage30
Title
CRS86543EPWpage30
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56524
Text
LIBRARY as WASHINGTDN UMVER-smr ST. Lguls —. Mo.
CRS86543EPWpage28
Title
CRS86543EPWpage28
Page from
info:fedora/mu:56524
Text
M‘

Pages