(173,601 - 173,620 of 183,375)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0413
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
7.5 3.7 27 Hourly Rate 834 .58 4.50 16.90 7.8 3.8 29 Other Time Rate 23 .48 4.30 26.10 8.8 6.1 54 Grape Harvest Workers 1014 .59 4.60 17.10 7.7 3.7 29 Piece Rate 183 .66 4.90 18.10 7.5 3.7 27 Hourly Rate 811 .58 4.50 16.60 7.7 3.7 29 Other Time Rate 20 .51 4.40 27.00 8.6 6.2 53 Other Workers 26 .49 4.40 25.70 8.9 5.9 53 Piece Rate - - - - 5 - - Time Rate 26 .49 4.40 25.70 8.9 5.9 53 The few other
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0416
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
Domestic White 853 S .59 $34. so $18.30 7.7 4.0 31 Negro and Indian 33 .56 4.50 13.40 8.1 3.0 24 Foreign _1_/ 146 .58 4.50 12.10 7.8 2.7 21 Seasonal Grape Harvest Workers Domestic White 796 .60 4.60 18.00 7.6 3.9 30 Negro and Indian 33 .56 4.50 13.40 8.1 3.0 24 Foreign l/ 131 .61 4.50 10.30 7.4 2.3 17 Regular Grape Harvest Workers Domestic White 40 .52 4.40 23.00 Negro and Indian 801} Foreign ;/ 6 _ 2/ 2
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0417
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
383 .57 $4.50 $15.20 7.8 3.1. 27 Under 18 23 .59 3.80 14.60 6.4 3.8 25 18 - 24 22 .59 4.50 $0.90 7.7 '4.6 36 25 - 44 90 .55 4.60 20.30 8.4 4.4 37 45 — 64 50 .54 4.30 20.40 8.0 4.7 38 65 and over 17 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ .1/ Age not reported _2__/ 181 .60 4.50 10.20 7.5 2.3 17 Females 608 .58 4.50 18.70 7.8 4.1 32 Under 18 51 .56 4.10 15.60 7.3 3.8 28 18 - 24 31 .56 4.20 17.60 7.5 4.2 31 25 - 44 220
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0420
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
- 9 l7h 4 170 55 Ah 71 - lo - 19 157 2 15h 39 38 77 l 20 - 29 125 - 125 l2 19 9h - 30 - 39 l2O 3 ll? - 29 88 - A0 - A9 344 23 311 25 57 229 l0 50 - 59 30 6 2l - 5 lo 3 60 and over 30 8 l0 — 2 8 l2 Percent of All Man-hours _1/ 100% 7% 89% 7% 20% 52% 4% l/ Based on total hours worked during survey week by each type of workers. Seasonal grape harvest workers made up 93 percent of all workers
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0421
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
-19.. Table 22: Percent of Hired Workers Receiving Specified Perquisites by Duration of Employment and Operation, Grape Farms, Chautauqua and Erie Counties, New York, week Ended October 14, 1945. Grape Harvest Item : Total : Workers 2 Other : Regular : Seasonal : Workers Total Number of Workers 1064 48 988 28 Percent lOO 100 100 lOO Percent Receiving House or Lodging and Meals 1/ 5 12 4 11 House
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0410
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
seasonally employed. Table 7: Distribution of Hired workers by Age and Duration of Employment, Grape Farms, Chautauqua and Erie Counties, New York, deek Ended October la, l9A5. : Regular Workers : Seasonal Workers Age 3 (150 days and over) : (Less than 150 days) Total reporting age ;/ Number 66 667 Percent 100 100 Under 18 (percent) 3 12 18 — 24 (percent) 15 9 25 - Ah " 43 A6 45 - 64 " 3A 2A 65
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0411
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
: Females :ment,Source: : : : tandébx All Reported by Unit of Payment 1055 69 131 216 639 Percent lOO lOO lOO lOO lOO Piece Rate g/ (Percent) 18 - 13 24 20 Hourly Rate (Percent) 79 78 87 74 79 Daily Rate (Percent) 1 - - 2 1 Weekly Rate (Percent) 1 A — - — Monthly Rate (Percent) 1 l8 — - - Grape Harvest Workers 1027 as 131 213 635 Percent lOO lOO lOO lOO lOO Piece Hate (Percent) 18 — 13 2A 20 Hourly Rate
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0407
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
and Erie Counties, New York, l9h5. Man-daysflired Labor 3 Number of : Percent of Reguirements : Farms : Total Total Reporting 366 100 None 171 47 l - 9 3A 9 l0 - 19 59 16 2O - 29 36 l0 30 - 39 17 5 40 - A9 15 A 50 — 99 22 6 100 ~ 1A9 7 2 l5O and over 5 1 Average per farm l7.6 Almost half of the sample farms required no hired labor during the l9h5 grape harvest. However, hired labor requirements for the l9
-
-
Title
-
WagesInAgriculture1945-46p0406
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:440909
-
Text
-
-4- Table 1: Distribution of Sample Grape Farms l/ by Number of Hired Workers, Chautauqua and Erie Counties, New York, Week Ended October lg, 1965. Number of : Number of Farms Hired 3 Total : Chautauqua Co. : Erie Co. Workers : Number : Percent : Number : Number Total 377 100 315 62 O 187 50 146 Al 1 14 A 13 1 2 35 9 32 3 3 22 6 20 2 A 31 8 28 3 5 19 5 19 - 6 16 A 15 1 7 8 2 5 3 8 12 3 9 3 9 5 1
-
-
Title
-
The impact of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 ...: on selected federal research and development agencies and programs
-
Date
-
1986
-
Summary
-
This report examines the impact of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, on the FY86 budget of selected research and development (R&D) programs. The analysis of the report focuses on the likely scope of reprogramming, and its potential impact on each program or agency in general. The qualitative program analysis also tried to determine what research areas were likely to suffer most under Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and if the different R&D agencies planned to cut the number of research grans or the size of each grant and how either action might affect their programs.
-
-
Title
-
Child support enforcement: An examination of current proposals
-
Date
-
1983
-
Summary
-
From FY 1976 to FY 1982, total child support collections rose from $512 million to $1.8 billion; Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) collections rose from $204 million to $787 million. During the same period, the number of paternities established increased from 15,000 to 174,000. Notwithstanding its achievements, changes are proposed in the program because of the rising net cost of the program to the Federal Government and the perception that many parents still fail to pay child support obligations. This paper examines the financing of the child support enforcement program, discusses various collection methods, explains the Administration's budget recommendations to restructure the Federal financing of the program, and analyzes title V of the proposed Economic Equity Act.
-
-
Title
-
Comparison of 98th Congress bills proposing enterprise zones, revitalization areas, or job expansion areas
-
Date
-
1984
-
Summary
-
This comparison shows the main features of the Administration's enterprise zone bills, and of the several bills that have been introduced in the 98th Congress as alternatives. These are the bills that have been the subject of hearings. H.R. 1735 (Mitchell) and S. 634 (Hart et al.) are companion bills emphasizing participation by residents and community organizations in Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP's) and General Stock Ownership Corporations (GSOC's). H.R. 2375 (Nowak) includes provisions for extension of the Economic Development Administration programs and increased activity by the Small Business Administration, in addition to the tax incentives featured in the other bills.
-
-
Title
-
Comparison of major provisions of selected bills on spousal impoverishment under medicaid
-
Date
-
1987
-
Summary
-
Concern has been expressed about the impact various Medicaid rules have on married couples when one member of the couple requires long-term nursing home care and the other spouse remains in the community. A number of bills have been introduced in the 100th Congress to address the impoverishment an elderly spouse in the community may experience as a result of Medicaid rules, when the other spouse becomes eligible for Medicaid as a nursing home patient. This paper compares the provisions of three so-called "spousal impoverishment" bills.
-
-
Title
-
Clean Water Act
-
Date
-
1987
-
Summary
-
At the end of the last session of Congress, Congress overwhelming approved reauthorization of the Clean Water Act. President Reagan, objecting to the cost involved, vetoed the legislation. The Act was promptly reintroduced at the beginning of the 100th Congress and again overwhelming passed by both Houses of Congress, vetoed again by President Reagan, and subsequently passed by both Houses of Congress by sufficiently large margins to override the veto. This Overviews presents editorial commentary on the reauthorization of the Clean Water Act, the President's veto, and whether or not the Act should be reauthorized over President Reagan's objections.
Pages