(175,481 - 175,500 of 180,082)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
CRS84-197EPWp37
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:86726
-
Text
-
cm ii $fATEiSTUDENTiINCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM c :,; i e ihWho's Eligible: iIf you are an undergraduate or graduate atuoent with subé 3% it w: .:. i stantial financial need enrolled on a fullétime basis at a partici- ii; J a ac: iipating school and reside iu a participating State, you may be eligible ‘for a grant§“ F; f iflow Much You Can Receive: You can receive up to $2,000 a year depending
-
-
Title
-
CRS84-197EPWp39
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:86726
-
Text
-
cRs~1o 07 SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL oppoarunrrv GRANT PROGRAH Who's E1igib1e§_ if you are an undergraduate student who has financial need 0T Hann who is enrolled on at least a half-tine basis in a oarcicioatingi 7‘co11ege,univers1ty or vocational/technical school you may be elieihle A for assistance. ‘How Much You Can Receive: iYou can receive a grant of up to $2,000 per year0 %idepending
-
-
Title
-
Bovine growth hormone (somatotropin): Agricultural and regulatory issues
-
Date
-
1986
-
Summary
-
Several U.S. companies plan to introduce a new product to the dairy industry called bovine growth hormone (bGH), or bovine somatotropin (BST). When injected into dairy cows in test herds, this product has stimulated large increases in milk output without corresponding increases in production costs. However, BST, which must gain Food and Drug Administration approval before it can be offered commercially, has raised a number of controversial questions among lawmakers, who are concerned about its impact on an already burdensome U.S. milk supply, on the structure and conduct of dairy farming, and on consumer safety, among other things.
-
-
Title
-
CRS84-197EPWp43
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:86726
-
Text
-
A . Cooperative....g...}...... 276 323 367‘ t 21% Apprenticeship/oJT: i i 1sc 5 Monchs........ 249 279 305 i 13g V 2d 6 Months......... 186 i 217 243 1 13 _ 3d 6 Months......... 124 155 180 A 13 4th and Any 4 ‘ n egg Succeeding 6 Mos. 62 92 119 e13 ‘Farm Cooperative: % V ' Fu11>T1!Iile...V........ p - i ' “j Three-Quarter Time.. 207 242 i\ 275 H g" 16» : Timecooooooooooi '_' e ‘V e
-
-
Title
-
CRS84-197EPWp41
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:86726
-
Text
-
cas-11% VETERANS‘ EDUCATION ASSISTANCE % (POST-KOREAN AND VIETNAM ERA VETERANS) Who's Eligible: If you are a veteran of the armed forceswho served en ae¥ «inc?=i€.;;§“:,:-2.:.a4j,P“.s-"i ._2-iv’-.:‘.;‘;-!.'~,«‘%-. .‘-'. = U.” ;,x ~ x w a seryiee-connected disability), any part of which occurred between} February 1, 1955 and December 31, 1976, and will be attending an e11- g1b1
-
-
Title
-
The Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 and the poultry and egg industries - current law and proposed changes
-
Date
-
1986
-
Summary
-
The basic intent of H.R. 2970 is to amend the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, as amended (7 U.S.C. 181), to extend the existing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Packers and Stockyards Administration over the poultry and egg industries. This report gives a brief legislative history of the Packers and Stockyards Act, discusses the major features of the proposed bill, and presents the views of the various groups that would be affected by the proposal if it became law. A side-by-side comparison of current law and H.R. 2970 is attached.
-
-
Title
-
The methanol fuel alternative: What is the appropriate federal role?
-
Date
-
1984
-
Summary
-
This report describes the technical, environmental and economic considerations that shape the potential for methanol-powered vehicles to displace conventionally-powered cars and buses. It also identifies Federal policies which affect methanol vehicle development, fuel use and fuel production. The major proposals to encourage methanol vehicle use, including H.R. 4855 (Sharp) and H.R. 5075 (Broyhill), are examined; and their policy options are discussed.
-
-
Title
-
CRS8616Fpage03
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:89794
-
Text
-
ABSTRACT This Alert explains how the Department of Defense is affected by — the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings sequestration process, how the President has chosen to use the limited options allowed in the FY 1986 defense budget reduction process, and how the reductions affect the distribution of defenseispending.
-
-
Title
-
CRS8616Fpage05
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:89794
-
Text
-
CRS-v CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 111 ISSUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . .. 1 I. Background ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . .... 1 II. Defense Spending Sumary of G-R-H Budget Reductions ..... . . . . . .... . . . . ..............,....... 2 III. The Effect of G
-
-
Title
-
CRS8616Fpage01
-
Page from
-
info:fedora/mu:89794
-
Text
-
% Report No. 86-16 F Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress A nt Publications Washington, D.C. 20540 Govemme Unit Aug 0 4 1994 Washington UHIVGFSIW Libraries St. Louis. MO 63130 PDLICY ALERT 2 N G E, Q N G E R I A PKKCKPEIKY’ {*9 SF 0 E... I N 3.11% E RA RY Wfighifiston bmmersim THE GRAMM-RUDMAN-HOLLINGS SEQUESTRATION PROCESS FOR FY 1986: A SUMMARY OF DOD ELEMENTS IN THE OMB
Pages