744 AMERICAN RAILROAD Jon1tNA.IJ. AND 3-’ iinient. The advantages possessed by the mouth blow pipe over all those instru- T meats whose blast is produced by artifi. cial moans, consists in its portability, economy, and the facility of immediately suspending or modifying the blast. “The chemist does not possess,” says Dr. Fara- day, “a more ready, powerful, and gene- rally useful instrument, than the mouth blow pipe, and every student should early accustom himself to its effectual use and application.” :- €33 " visible. The pupil will now he possessed lof a blow pipe (fig. 3,) with an exceed- ingly minute jet; and if he puff out his checks to the utmost, and place the end I) within his lips, while the other extremity is held within a short distance of a can- dle, (fig. 5,) he will, after a few trials, find no difficulty in keeping the flame coiztimmlly, and without 2'11termi.§sion, hori- zontal and clear. The operation which he will be required to perform, in order to keep his cheeks constantly distended, notwithstanding the esca.pe from the jet, cannot easily be described, but will na- turally ofi"er itself when the expenditure of air is very small. When the pupil has succeeded in keeping up a constant blast for several minutes, by this means, he may enlarge the aperture by degrees, practising between each enlargcinciit, till he finds he can manage a blow pipe with a large here, when he should purchase B r°r° The supply of a continued stream of air, is the chief. dificulty which a begin- ner experiences in learning the use of this instruiiieiit,aiid this difficulty is, I ap- , prehend, not unfrequently increased by the employment of a blow pipe with too large an orifice, in the first instance." The following method of constructing, will, I havereason to believe, he found more of- iicacious than an other hitherto publish. ‘ed: 511103 I MY _. by its means, succeed- ‘efli it} less than half an hour, in commu- nicating the art of blowing to a class of several persons. Let the pupil procure a tube of glass, 1) 6, about thirteen inches long, and of the size and thickness of a. Let him now thoroughly heat the tube at c, about two inches from the end, by slow. Hy turp'ing it round in the flame of a can. die: 6!‘, What is better, a spirit lamp. When he finds that it will yield, let him bend it gradually till it has acquired the positioii represented by fig. 2. The part at is now to be heated in the same man_ tier, till it is found soft enough to draw out, when the part is must be gradually withdrawn, as represented in fig, 4 up it terminates in a point- this 0'5; ’h be h Id f _ 3‘ p_ in S onld e or a iiiintito or-. two m the pomt Of the ~flt1l'1]t'~}, In Qyigign to thicken ii, and 222°“ cold ‘t ‘S 39. 19.9. grmind away with a. 7 until thug.‘ .poss,i_b’l,e orifice is one of brass, with an ivory or tinned mouth piece, for general use. _ Among the numerous hydrostatic blow pipes which have already appearetl in your Magazine, the pupil who wishes to manufacture his own apparatus, may as. suredly find one which will form a siibsti- iute for the table blow pipe. I subjoin a ll . plan for one, which ~ may be constructed, at a trifling expense, by almost every stu. dent, and in situations ¢ where the articles ,_.of wo1'kniaiisliip re- quisite for the con. struction of a more complicated machine, could not be procured. a 5 (fig. 6,) is a com- mon pail, about half filled with water; c s a large flower pot, inserted, and fasten- ed in by any convenient method ; cl is a mouth blow pipe, (glass would do on an emergency,) fastened in air tight, with a cork and lute, to the hole at the bottom of the flower pot; e is a bent tube of glass, or metal, terminating under the mouth of the flower pot. When air is blown in from the mouth at 6, it rises into the body of the internal vessel, and dis- places the water, which, in endeavoring to regain its level, forces out the air from the jet ofthe. blow pipe, with a force pro- 6. water displaced. On. the Resistance of Fluids; by Geo. VV. KEELY: Professor of Natural Philoso- phy, in Waterville College. s1R.-I perceive in No. 55 of the Journal, that Professor Wallace has announced it new measure of the resistance of a fluid in a direction perpendicular to a plain surface moving in it, viz: That it. is as the sine of the inclination of the plane. T Permit me to statemy reasons for adhering to the old doctrine, that the perpendicular resistance is as the square of the sine of inclination. It is well known that the latter measure has been deduced from the allegetl facts that the number and the force of the resisting particles vary as the sine of the inclination. If it be t1‘t1e that the res_,is_t;i=,nco' to a plane portioned to the height of the column of ‘ surface moving in a fluid is as the number of particles it strikes in its course, and that the number of particles in any indefinitely thin fluid lamina is as the area of that lamina, (nei- ther of which A . we think Pro- \_ ' fessor W. will ‘\ deny,) it fol- \ lows that, if C‘ -.............. 1) BD be a sec- tion of it E F plane inclin- ed to the di. rection BA of its motion, and BF an equal section of an equal plane perpendicular to the same direction, the number of particles BD will strike is to the number that BF will strike in’ the same. time, as the parallelo- gram ABCD is to the parallelogram AEFB_ ; and the resistances are therefore, on this‘ account, as B6} is to BD, or as the siiies ot the inclinations of the sections; the resist- ances to the planes are of courSe 111 the same ratio. Now this familiar demonst.rat.ion 'v'volil(l seem to settle the question ; but Professor Wallace nrguics, “ that the ‘nijmbcfr of pat‘- ticles striking the plane. does not depend on the breadth of the fluid column BG BF, but on l]l€.S1l’l:f(l‘C8 of the plane, beeau‘~e the particles that act on the plane are those in contact with it, and tlierefore'. their tllll’lli3t‘.i‘ is as its superficial area.” Now, admitting it to be true that the number of material particles in contact. with the plane, at any instant, is t.1ie.same, whctlicr it he perpen- dicular or inclined to-the direction of the motion, it does not, we think, necessarily follow that the ntiinbei‘ of particles struck in any given time will he the same. But neither is it evident that the number of par- ticles in coiitact with the plane is the same for every inclination of the plane. The burden of proof, however, seems to lie with Prof. W. He‘ has assumed the general phy- sical fact that the number of particles iii contact with the plane, at any instant, is the same for any position of the plane, and he has deduced an inference, not formally expressed, indeed, but surely implied, other- wise the argument is worth nothing, that the number of particles struck in any given time is as the number in contact with the plane at any instant. Now we think the fact and conclusion may very safely be de. mod, and it becomes Prof. W. to show that they are consistent with some hypothesis respecting the form and relative position of the ultimate particles of a fluid body. In any hypothesis, we believe the following positions will be found to hold : First. Whether the number of particles, at any instant, in contact with the plane, in different positions, is the sonic, depends wholly on the hypothesis. Second. If the number is the same in difl"erent positions, it will be found that the number of fluid strata struck in any given time, is as the sine of the inclination. Third. If the number is not the same, then it varies as the sine of the inclination. and the number of strata struck will, in any given time, be the same. If Prof. W. can devise any hypothesis with which these positions do not agree, we will allow he can disturb our belief in the truth of the law of the square of the Sines‘ The wide difl'ercnce between the results of observation and those of the old theory. would tend rather to dissuade us from ad- mitting the truth of the new, when we con- ‘ sidcr what important physical circuinstaii- cos are and must. be omitted in the condi- tions.--.-[S3jillinian’s J.ournal.]